skip to main content

Performance of Microbial Fuel Cell for Wastewater Treatment and Electricity Generation

1Research Center for Environmental Pollutants and Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran, Islamic Republic of

2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health and Center for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

3Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Published: 17 Jun 2013.
Editor(s): H. Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2013 The Authors. Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Renewable energy will have an important role as a resource of energy in the future. Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a promising method to obtain electricity from organic matter and wastewater treatment simultaneously. In a pilot study, use of microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation investigated. The bacteria of ruminant used as inoculums. Synthetic wastewater used at different organic loading rate. Hydraulic retention time was an effective factor in removal of soluble COD and more than 49% removed. Optimized HRT to achieve the maximum removal efficiency and sustainable operation could be regarded 1.5 and 2.5 hours. Columbic efficiency (CE) affected by organic loading rate (OLR) and by increasing OLR, CE reduced from 71% to 8%. Maximum voltage was 700mV. Since the microbial fuel cell reactor considered as an anaerobic process, it may be an appropriate alternative for wastewater treatment
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: bacteria; columbic efficiency; electricity; microbial fuel cell

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahn, Y. & Logan, B.E. (2010) Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 101, 469–475
  2. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC
  3. Biffinger, J.C., Byrd, J.N., Dudley, B.L. & Ringeisen, B.R. (2008) Oxygen exposure promotes fuel diversity for Shewanella oneidensis microbial fuel cells. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 23, 820–826
  4. Bond, D.R. & Lovley, D.R. (2003) Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(3), 1548–1555
  5. Bookie, M., Jung Rae, Sanguine, K., John, O., Regan, M., Bruce, E. & Logan, B.E. (2005) Electricity Generation from Swine Wastewater Using Microbial Fuel Cells. Journal of Water Research, 39(20), 4961-4968
  6. Carvera, S.M., Vuoriranta, P. & Tuovinen, O.H. (2011) A thermophilic microbial fuel cell design. Journal of Power Resources, 196, 3757–3760
  7. Chaudhuri, S.K. & Lovley, D.R. (2003) Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1229–1232
  8. Cheng, S., Liu, H. & Logan, B.E. (2006) Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environmental Science Technology, 40, 2426-2432
  9. Feng, Y., Lee, H., Wang, X., Liu, Y. & He, W. (2010) Continuous electricity generation by a graphite granule baffled air–cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioresource Technology, 101, 632–638
  10. Jiang, J., Zhao, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang. G. & Lee. D.J. (2009) Electricity generation from bio-treatment of sewage sludge with microbial fuel cell. Bioresource Technology, 100, 5808-5812
  11. Kim, H.J., Park, H.S., Hyun, M.S., Chang, I.S., Kim, M. and Kim, B.H. (2002) A mediator-less microbial fuel cell using a metal reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 30(2), 145-152
  12. Liu, H. & Logan, B.E. (2004) Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environmental Science Technology, 38 4040–4046
  13. Liu, H., Cheng, S. & Logan, B.E. (2005) Production of Electricity from Acetate or Butyrate Using a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. Environmental Scienence Technology, 39, 658–662
  14. Liu, H., Cheng, S. & Logan, B.E. (2005) Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environmental Scienence Technology, 39, 658–662
  15. Liu, H., Cheng, S. & Logan, B.E. (2005) Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environmental Science Technology, 39, 658–662
  16. Logan, B.E. (2007) Microbial fuel cell. 1st ed, John Wiley & Sons, Publication
  17. Luo, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, R., Zhang, C. (2010) Power generation from furfural using the microbial fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 195, 190–194
  18. Mansoori, H., Nikkhah, A., Rezaeian, M., Mirhadi,A. (2007) Research & Develop. 66-73
  19. Mohan, S.V., Mohanakrishna, G., Reddy, B.P., Saravanan, R. & Sarma, P.N. (2008) Bioelectricity generation from chemical wastewater treatment in mediatorless (anode) microbial fuel cell (MFC) using selectively enriched hydrogen producing mixed culture under acidophilic microenvironment Biochemical. Engineering, 39, 121-130
  20. Pant, D., Van, B.G., Diels, L., Vanbroekhoven, K. (2010) A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresource Technology, 101, 1533-43
  21. Patil, S.A., Surakasi, V.P., Koul, S., Ijmulwar, S., Vivek, A., Shouche, Y.S. & Kapadnis, B.P. (2009) Electricity generation using chocolate industry wastewater and its treatment in activated sludge based microbial fuel cell and analysis of developed microbial community in the anode chamber. Bioresource Technology, 100(21), 5132–5139
  22. Potter, M.C. (1911) Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds, B 84,260-276. Proc. Roy. SOC. London Ser
  23. Rabaey, K., Boon, N., Hofte, M. & Verstraete, W. (2005) Microbial phenazine production enhances electron transfer in biofuel cells. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 3401–3408
  24. Rabaey, K., Boon, N., Hofte, M. & Verstraete, W. (2005) Microbial phenazine production enhances electron transfer in biofuel cells. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 3401–3408
  25. Rismani-Yazdi, H., Ann D, Christy., Burk A. Dehority., Morrison, M., Zhongtang, Yu., Tuovinen, Olli H. (2007) Electricity generation from cellulose by rumen microorganisms in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnology Bioengineering. 97, 1398-407
  26. Schroder, U., Nieen, J. & Scholz, F. (2003) A Generation of microbial fuel cells with current outputs boosted by more than one order of magnitude. Angewandte. Chemie, 42, 2880–2883
  27. Valerie, J.W., Saito, T., Michael, A.H. & Logan, B.E. (2011) Polymer coatings as separator layers for microbial fuel cell cathodes. Journal of Power Resources, 196, 3009–3014
  28. Wen, Q., Wua, Y., Cao, D., Zhao, L. & Sun, Q. (2009) Electricity generation and modeling of microbial fuel cell from continuous beer brewery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 100, 4171-4175

Last update:

  1. Comparison between conventional and modified microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation

    A. H. Ali, H. A. Al-Mussawy, M. J. Hussein, N. J. Hamadi. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16 (12), 2019. doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02355-x

Last update: 2024-10-04 17:17:15

  1. Comparison between conventional and modified microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation

    A. H. Ali, H. A. Al-Mussawy, M. J. Hussein, N. J. Hamadi. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16 (12), 2019. doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02355-x
  2. Bioelectricity production from various feedstocks using pure strain of bacillus firmus

    Singh S.. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 5 (2), 2016. doi: 10.14710/ijred.5.2.119-127