skip to main content

Flexible Scheduling Strategy and Optimization Algorithm for Container Resources in Power Environment

Hainan Power Grid Co., Ltd., China

Received: 17 Apr 2026; Published: 31 Aug 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Electric power business loads have significant periodicity, burstiness and high reliability requirements. Traditional static allocation of container resources or general elastic scheduling strategies are difficult to achieve efficient and energy-saving utilization of resources while ensuring service quality. Therefore, the load patterns and constraints of typical power business scenarios are analyzed. A mixed integer programming model is established with the goal of minimizing service response time, resource fragmentation rate, and system energy consumption. A hierarchical elastic scheduling framework is proposed, which combines threshold-based reactive scaling and a pre-scheduling mechanism based on bidirectional long short-term memory network load prediction. Compared with the Kubernetes default horizontal Pod autoscaler and the classic best adaptation algorithm, the optimized scheduling scheme reduced the average application response time by 31.2% in typical mixed load scenarios. The average cluster resource utilization increased from 58.72% to 86.63%. The service violation rate was controlled from 8.55% to less than 1.00%. Through intelligent node integration, the overall energy consumption of the system was reduced by approximately 22.3%. The research provides effective theoretical methods and practical reference for solving resource dynamic management and optimizing cloud native infrastructure in the power industry.

Keywords: Container scheduling; Elastic scaling; Resource optimization; Multi-objective particle swarm optimization; Kubernetes.

Article Metrics:

  1. Akkepalli, S. (2025). A Novel Framework of Anomaly-Based Network Intrusion Detection using Hybrid CNN, Bi-LSTM Deep Learning Techniques. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(19), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i19s.3015
  2. Cen, H. (2023). Assembly Sequence and Assembly Path Planning of Robot Automation Products Based on Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization. International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems, 15(3), 400-400. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.15.3.20
  3. Damayanti, A., Sarto, S., & Sediawan, W. (2020). Biohydrogen Production by Reusing Immobilized Mixed Culture in Batch System. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.9.1.37-42
  4. Du, B., Guo, S., Guo, J., Sun, X., Wang, K., & Yang, Z. (2024). A Pareto-based hybrid genetic simulated annealing algorithm for multi-objective hybrid production line balancing problem considering disassembly and assembly. International Journal of Production Research, 62(13), 4809-4830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2280696
  5. Gill, S. S., Kumar, M., Samriya, J. K., & Dubey, K. (2023). QoS‐aware resource scheduling using whale optimization algorithm for microservice applications. Software: Practice and Experience, 54(4), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3211
  6. Guo, J., Li, Z., Lou, J., Tang, Z., Wang, T., & Jia, W. (2025). Online Layer-Aware Joint Request Scheduling, Container Placement, and Resource Provision in Edge Computing. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 18(1), 328-341. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2024.3504237
  7. Han, Q., Shan, C., Gao, R., Liu, T., Yang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2025). KCES: A Workflow Containerization Scheduling Scheme Under Cloud-Edge Collaboration Framework. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 12(2), 2026-2042. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3466231
  8. Hansen, F., Bayo, A., Ye, X., Zhang, Y., Du, X., & Li, J. (2024). Molecular spectral line data preprocessing container load grouping prediction algorithm based on EMD-LSTM. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.59782/aai.v1i1.279
  9. Hyder, M. F., Ahmed, S. H., Latif, M., Aslam, K., Rab, A. U., & Siddiqui, M. T. (2024). Towards Digital Forensics Investigation of WordPress Applications Running Over Kubernetes. IETE Journal of Research, 70(4), 3856-3871. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2023.2195837
  10. Jia, W., Peng, W., & Tang, Z. (2025). LR2Scheduler: layer-aware, resource-balanced, and request-adaptive container scheduling for edge computing. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction, 7(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-025-00186-z
  11. Jiang, X., Song, B., Yan, H., & Yan, H. (2025). Optimization of Active Response Efficiency of Power Demand Side Based on Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 49(3), 822–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/18758967251353378
  12. Khan, S., Calheiros, R. N., Maurushat, A., & Momposhi, L. (2025). Next-Gen Threat Hunting: A Comparative Study of ML Models in Android Ransomware Detection. FinTech and Sustainable Innovation, 1, A3-A3. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewfsi52025685
  13. Li, K., Lin, W., Mo, R., Xu, M., & Zhong, H. (2025). A Cross-Workload Power Prediction Method Based on Transfer Gaussian Process Regression in Cloud Data Centers. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 13(3), 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2025.3575790
  14. Li, K., Lin, W., Wu, H., Zhang, H., Shi, F., & Shen, W. (2025). Container Scheduling Strategy Based on Image Layer Reuse and Sequential Arrangement in Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 24(9), 8700-8713. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2025.3557160
  15. Li, R., Liu, S., Wang, W., Zhong, S., Peng, Y., & Tian, Q. (2024). A graph-based approach for integrating massive data in container terminals with application to scheduling problem. International Journal of Production Research, 62(16), 5945-5965. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2304021
  16. Liu, Y., Yin, X., Quan, Y., & Xiang, P. (2026). Dynamic response prediction of long-span cable-stayed bridges by integrating Bi-LSTM and physical modeling. Advances in Structural Engineering, 29(2), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332251348615
  17. Pan, Y., Wang, R., Cao, J., Yu, T., Li, Y., & Zhang, C. (2025). Kube-IPM: A Kubernetes-Native Platform for Industrial Process Monitoring With Heterogeneous Sensor Data and Delay-Sensitive Prediction. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 12(16), 33671-33685. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3576567
  18. Park, S., & Bahn, H. (2024). Prediction Techniques of Container Workload Considering the Resource Usage Characteristics of CPU and Memory. The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 24(6), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2024.24.6.115
  19. Sarma, S. K. (2023). Metaheuristic based auto-scaling for microservices in cloud environment: a new container-aware application scheduling. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 19(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-12-2020-0213
  20. Thallapally, N. (2024). Scalable Application Deployment with Docker and Kubernetes. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.1.29
  21. Wellalage, A., Fackrell, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). A Monte Carlo simulation-based simulated annealing algorithm for predicting the minimum staffing requirement at a blood donor centre. Annals of Operations Research, 342(3), 1945-1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05297-3

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-03 06:52:03

No citation recorded.