skip to main content

View PDF Download fulltext

Wind turbine fault estimation using sliding mode observer based on Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model

1Electronics and Systems Laboratory - LES, Faculty of Sciences Oujda, Embeded Systems, Renewable Energy and Artificial Intelligence Team, ENSA, Oujda, Morocco

2Electronics, Signals, Systems and Computer Science Laboratory (LESSI), Faculty of Science, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Fez, Morocco

Received: 20 Oct 2025; Revised: 26 Dec 2025; Accepted: 22 Jan 2026; Available online: 5 Feb 2026; Published: 1 Mar 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper presents a fault-estimation approach for utility-scale wind turbines that combines Takagi–Sugeno (TS) fuzzy modeling with a sliding-mode observer (SMO). The nonlinear dynamics of the 4.8 MW benchmark turbine are represented by a TS structure, enabling an LMI-based synthesis of a robust TS–SMO. The proposed observer reconstructs both actuator faults affecting generator torque and sensor faults in blade-pitch measurements. MATLAB/Simulink validations under realistic operating conditions (operating-point variations, wind fluctuations, and disturbances) demonstrate accurate tracking and fast, stable fault reconstruction over the complete simulation horizon. Performance is assessed using the Normalized Sum of Squared Errors (NSSE): the reconstructed faults exhibit low NSSE values in the considered fault scenarios, with the blade-pitch sensor fault achieving NSSE =0.087 %. These results indicate reliable fault estimation while maintaining bounded residuals and avoiding drift. The method relies on standard industrial signals and entails modest online computations (matrix operations and a bounded switching term), facilitating integration into existing condition-monitoring and fault-tolerant control architectures. Overall, TS-guided sliding-mode observation is shown to be an effective and robust solution for wind-turbine fault diagnosis under nonlinearities and exogenous perturbations.

Keywords: Actuator faults; Fault diagnosis; Fault reconstruction; LMI; Observer design; Sensor faults; Sliding Mode Observer; Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy model; Wind energy.

Article Metrics:

  1. Abbas, M., Chafouk, H., & Ardjoun, S.A.E.M. (2024). Fault diagnosis in wind turbine current sensors: Detecting single and multiple faults with the extended Kalman filter bank approach. Sensors, 24(3), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030728
  2. Abdelbaky, M.A., Liu, X., & Jiang, D. (2020). Design and implementation of partial offline fuzzy model-predictive pitch controller for large-scale wind-turbines. Renewable Energy, 145, 981–996; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.074
  3. Alwi, H., Edwards, C., & Tan, C.P. (2011). Fault Detection and Fault-Tolerant Control Using Sliding Modes. Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-3
  4. Alwi, H., Edwards, C., & Marcos, A. (2012). Fault reconstruction using a LPV sliding mode observer for a class of LPV systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 349(2), 510–530; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.06.026
  5. Alwi, H., & Edwards, C. (2014). Robust fault reconstruction for linear parameter varying systems using sliding mode observers. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 24(14), 1947–1968; https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3018
  6. Apkarian, P., Gahinet, P., & Becker, G. (1995). Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: A design example. Automatica, 31(9), 1251–1261; https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(95)00038-X
  7. Azizi, A., Youssef, T., Kouadri, A., Mansouri, M., & Mimouni, M. F. (2024). Robust fault estimation for wind turbine pitch and drive train systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 155(Part B), 109673; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109673
  8. Borja-Jaimes, V., Adam-Medina, M., López-Zapata, B.Y., Vela Valdés, L.G., Claudio Pachecano, L., & Sánchez Coronado, E.M. (2022). Sliding mode observer-based fault detection and isolation approach for a wind turbine benchmark. Processes, 10(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010054
  9. Bououden, S., Chadli, M., Filali, S., & El Hajjaji, A. (2012). Fuzzy model based multivariable predictive control of a variable speed wind turbine: LMI approach. Renewable Energy, 37(1), 434–439; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.025
  10. Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM; https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970777
  11. Cao, M., Chen, X., & Jiang, D. (2016). Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on unscented Kalman filter and SCADA data. Energies, 9(10), 847; https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100847
  12. Chen, J., & Patton, R.J. (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer/Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5149-2
  13. Dey, S., Pisu, P., & Ayalew, B. (2015). A comparative study of three fault diagnosis schemes for wind turbines. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 23(5), 1853–1868; https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2015.2389713
  14. Efimov, D., Raïssi, T., Zolghadri, A., & Perruquetti, W. (2016). Design of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems. Automation and Remote Control, 77(2), 191–225; https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117916020016
  15. Fekih, A., Habibi, H., & Simani, S. (2022). Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control of wind turbines: An overview. Energies, 15(19), 7186; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197186
  16. Fernandez-Canti, R.M., Blesa, J., Tornil-Sin, S., & Puig, V. (2015). Fault detection and isolation for a wind turbine benchmark using a mixed Bayesian/set-membership approach. Annual Reviews in Control, 40, 59–69; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2015.08.002
  17. Gao, Z., & Liu, X. (2021). An overview on fault diagnosis, prognosis and resilient control for wind turbine systems. Processes, 9(2), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020300
  18. Georg, S., & Schulte, H. (2013). Actuator fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control of wind turbines using a Takagi–Sugeno sliding mode observer. In 2013 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol) (pp. 516–522). IEEE; https://doi.org/10.1109/SysTol.2013.6693872
  19. GWEC. (2025). Global Wind Report 2025. Global Wind Energy Council
  20. Kamal, E., Aitouche, A., Ghorbani, R., & Bayart, M. (2012). Unknown Input Observer with Fuzzy Fault Tolerant Control for Wind Energy System. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(20), 946–951; https://doi.org/10.3182/20120829-3-MX-2028.00069
  21. Maldonado-Correa, J., Martín-Martínez, S., Artigao, E., & Gómez-Lázaro, E. (2020). Using SCADA data for wind turbine condition monitoring: A systematic literature review. Energies, 13(12), 3132; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123132
  22. Mazenc, F., & Bernard, O. (2011). Interval observers for linear time-invariant systems with disturbances. Automatica, 47(1), 140–147; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.019
  23. Odgaard, P.F., Stoustrup, J., & Kinnaert, M. (2009). Fault tolerant control of wind turbines – A benchmark model. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 42(8), 155–160; https://doi.org/10.3182/20090630-4-ES-2003.00026
  24. Odgaard, P.F., Stoustrup, J., & Kinnaert, M. (2013). Fault-tolerant control of wind turbines: A benchmark model. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(4), 1168–1182; https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2013.2259235
  25. Pandit, R., Astolfi, D., Hong, J., Infield, D., & Santos, M. (2023). SCADA data for wind turbine data-driven condition/performance monitoring: A review on state-of-art, challenges and future trends. Wind Engineering, 47(2), 422–441; https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X221124031
  26. Pérez-Pérez, E.J., López-Estrada, F.R., Puig, V., Valencia-Palomo, G., & Santos-Ruiz, I. (2022). Fault diagnosis in wind turbines based on ANFIS and Takagi–Sugeno interval observers. Expert Systems with Applications, 206, 117698; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117698
  27. Rotondo, D., Puig, V., Nejjari, F., & Witczak, M. (2015). Automated generation and comparison of Takagi–Sugeno and polytopic quasi-LPV models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 277, 44–64; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.02.002
  28. Schulte, H., & Gauterin, E. (2015). Fault-tolerant control of wind turbines with hydrostatic transmission using Takagi–Sugeno and sliding mode techniques. Annual Reviews in Control, 40, 82–92; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2015.08.003
  29. Shtessel, Y., Edwards, C., Fridman, L., & Levant, A. (2014). Sliding Mode Control and Observation. Birkhäuser; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4893-0
  30. Song, Y., Jeon, T., Paek, I., & Dugarjav, B. (2022). Design and validation of pitch H-infinity controller for a large wind turbine. Energies, 15(22), 8763; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228763
  31. Tan, C.P., & Edwards, C. (2000). An LMI approach for designing sliding mode observers. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2587–2592; https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170110081723
  32. Tan, C.P., & Edwards, C. (2002). Sliding mode observers for detection and reconstruction of sensor faults. Automatica, 38(10), 1815–1821; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00098-5
  33. Tanaka, K., & Wang, H.O. (2004). Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach. John Wiley & Sons
  34. Taouil, M., El Ougli, A., Tidhaf, B., & Zrouri, H. (2023). Sensor fault reconstruction for wind turbine benchmark model using a modified sliding mode observer. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 13(5), 5066–5075; http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i5.pp5066-5075
  35. Taouil, M., Tidhaf, B., & El Ougli, A. (2024). Actuator fault estimation in wind turbine using a modified sliding mode observer based on Linear Matrix Inequality approach. Diagnostyka, 25(2), 1–9; https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/187887
  36. Taouil, M., El Ougli, A., & Tidhaf, B. (2025). Fault reconstruction of wind turbine actuators based on a modified sliding mode observer and evaluation of its accuracy using the root mean square error criterion. Interactions, 246(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-025-02261-4
  37. Tautz-Weinert, J., & Watson, S.J. (2017). Using SCADA data for wind turbine condition monitoring—A review. IET Renewable Power Generation, 11(4), 382–394; https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0248
  38. Teng, J., Li, C., Feng, Y., Yang, T., Zhou, R., & Sheng, Q.Z. (2021). Adaptive observer-based fault-tolerant control for sensor and actuator faults in wind turbines. Sensors, 21(24), 8170; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248170
  39. Wu, P., Liu, Y., Ferrari, R.M.G., & van Wingerden, J.-W. (2021). Floating offshore wind turbine fault diagnosis via regularized dynamic canonical correlation and Fisher discriminant analysis. IET Renewable Power Generation, 15(16), 4006–4018; https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12319
  40. WWEA. (2025). Global Wind Power Statistics 2024/2025. World Wind Energy Association
  41. Zhang, Y., Lv, Y., & Ge, M. (2021). Time–frequency analysis via complementary ensemble adaptive local iterative filtering and enhanced maximum correlation kurtosis deconvolution for wind turbine fault diagnosis. Energy Reports, 7, 2418–2435; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.045
  42. Zhao, H., Liu, H., Hu, W., & Yan, X. (2018). Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network. Renewable Energy, 127, 825–834; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.024

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-03-07 18:19:33

No citation recorded.