DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62097
View PDF Download fulltext

Development of an isothermal CO2 absorption process using DMC and PEG400 for carbon capture and storage technology

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java, 60111, Indonesia

Received: 12 Nov 2025; Revised: 26 Mar 2026; Accepted: 4 Apr 2026; Available online: 15 Apr 2026; Published: 1 May 2026.
Editor(s): Editor Office
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to develop and evaluate a green binary solvent system based on dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG400) for physical CO2 absorption. Efficient and environmentally benign solvents are essential to support large-scale decarbonization efforts. The DMC–PEG400 system was formulated at molar ratios of 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4 to assess its absorption performance. Isothermal solubility experiments were performed at 303.15–323.15 K and 3–7 bar, complemented by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to elucidate the absorption mechanism. The FTIR spectra showed the emergence of characteristic CO2 vibrational bands without alterations to the solvent’s fingerprint region, confirming that CO₂ uptake proceeds through physical dissolution rather than chemical interaction. The DMC–PEG400 mixtures demonstrated clear temperature and pressure dependencies typical of physical solvents, with solubility decreasing at elevated temperatures and increasing proportionally with pressure. Among the tested formulations, the 1:3 molar ratio exhibited the highest absorption capacity, achieving 0.0606 mole CO₂/mole solution at 303.15 K and 7 bar. This performance arises from an optimal balance between interaction sites provided by PEG400 and the moderate viscosity needed to facilitate efficient CO2 diffusion. In contrast, the 1:4 mixture displayed reduced capacity due to excessive viscosity and limited free volume. Overall, the results highlight the promising potential of DMC–PEG400 mixtures, particularly at the 1:3 ratio, as tunable and sustainable physical solvents for CO₂ capture. Their favorable solubility behavior, stability, and benign chemical nature position them as viable candidates for next-generation carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies.

Keywords: Carbon dioxide; Green solvents; Isothermal absorption; Dimethyl carbonate; Polyethylene glycol
Funding: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember under contract 1153/PKS/ITS/2025

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Int Conf. of Chemical and Material Engineering 2025
Language : EN
Recent articles
Immobilized L-arginine on methacrylate polymer as reusable heterogeneous catalyst for crude palm oil transesterification Utility-scale wind power generation potential in low-wind regions: Insights for achieving the sustainable energy transition in developing countries Optimization and characterization of bioethanol production from Icacina trichanta Oliv and Anchomanes difformis Blume as non-food starch feedstocks Methyl ester production from high free fatty acid content with Ce/Zeolite bifunctional catalyst Nickel-vanadium impregnated to hydrotalcite for hydrocracking of waste cooking oil Upcycling EAF graphite electrode waste into graphene-oxide–doped PEDOT:PSS for inverted perovskite solar cells More recent articles
Most cited articles
Castor Seed from Melkasa Agricultural Research Centre, East Showa, Ethiopia and it’s biodiesel performance in Four Stroke Diesel Engine Production of Solid Fuel by Torrefaction Using Coconut Leaves As Renewable Biomass Kinetic and Enhancement of Biogas Production For The Purpose of Renewable Fuel Generation by Co-digestion of Cow Manure and Corn Straw in A Pilot Scale CSTR System Biogas Production from Cow Manure Adaptation of VSC-HVDC Connected DFIG Based Offshore Wind Farm to Grid Codes: A Comparative Analysis More cited articles
  1. Aboshatta, M., & Magueijo, V. (2021). A comprehensive study of co2 absorption and desorption by choline-chloride/levulinic-acid-based deep eutectic solvents. Molecules, 26(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES26185595
  2. Altamash, T., Amhamed, A., Aparicio, S., & Atilhan, M. (2020). Effect of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors on Co2 absorption by deep eutectic solvents. Processes, 8(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8121533
  3. Anggraini, Y., Yusuf, A., Wonorahardjo, S., Kurnia, D., Viridi, S., & Sutjahja, I. M. (2022). Role of C2 methylation and anion type on the physicochemical and thermal properties of imidazolium-based ionic liquids. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 15(8), 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103963
  4. Bose, D., Bhattacharya, R., Kaur, T., Pandya, R., Sarkar, A., Ray, A., Mondal, S., Mondal, A., Ghosh, P., & Chemudupati, R. I. (2024). Innovative approaches for carbon capture and storage as crucial measures for emission reduction within industrial sectors. Carbon Capture Science and Technology, 12.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100238
  5. Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., & Fan, X. (2021). Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110490
  6. Chen, Y., Ma, C., Ji, X., Yang, Z., & Lu, X. (2020). Thermodynamic study on aqueous polyethylene glycol 200 solution and performance assessment for CO2 separation. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLUID.2019.112336
  7. Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2015). Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 9, 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001
  8. Davison, J. (2007). Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy, 32(7), 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2006.07.039
  9. Firmansyah, V., Adinarayana, M. K., Tetrisyanda, R., & Wibawa, G. (2023). Scenario of renewable energy transition from fossil energy resources towards net zero emission in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 467. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346704005
  10. Ghazali, Z., Suhaili, N., Tahari, M. N. A., Yarmo, M. A., Hassan, N. H., & Othaman, R. (2020). Impregnating deep eutectic solvent choline chloride:urea:polyethyleneimine onto mesoporous silica gel for carbon dioxide capture. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(3), 3249–3260. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2020.01.073
  11. Gui, X., Tang, Z., & Fei, W. (2010). CO2 capture with physical solvent dimethyl carbonate at high pressures. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 55(9), 3736–3741. https://doi.org/10.1021/je1002708
  12. Guiot, J., & Cramer, W. (2016). Climate change: The 2015 Paris Agreement thresholds and Mediterranean basin ecosystems. Science, 354(6311), 465–468. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5015
  13. Handayani, P. A., Abdullah, A., & Hadiyanto, H. (2017). Biodiesel Production from Nyamplung (Calophyllum inophyllum) Oil using Ionic Liquid as A Catalyst and Microwave Heating System. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 12(2), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.12.2.807.293-298
  14. Haider, M. B., Jha, D., Marriyappan Sivagnanam, B., & Kumar, R. (2018). Thermodynamic and Kinetic Studies of CO2 Capture by Glycol and Amine-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 63(8), 2671–2680. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00015
  15. Im, D., Roh, K., Kim, J., Eom, Y., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Economic assessment and optimization of the Selexol process with novel additives. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.001
  16. Isaifan, R. J., & Amhamed, A. (2018). Review on Carbon Dioxide Absorption by Choline Chloride/Urea Deep Eutectic Solvents. Advances in Chemistry, 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2675659
  17. Kanniche, M., Gros-Bonnivard, R., Jaud, P., Valle-Marcos, J., Amann, J. M., & Bouallou, C. (2010). Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2009.05.005
  18. Kheirinik, M., Ahmed, S., & Rahmanian, N. (2021). Comparative techno-economic analysis of carbon capture processes: Pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion operations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132413567
  19. Krishnan, A., Gopinath, K. P., Vo, D. V. N., Malolan, R., Nagarajan, V. M., & Arun, J. (2020). Ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents and liquid polymers as green solvents in carbon capture technologies: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 18(6), 2031–2054). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01057-y
  20. Leonzio, G., & Shah, N. (2024). Recent advancements and challenges in carbon capture, utilization and storage. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 46. 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100895
  21. Li, B., Liu, H., Zhou, M., Wu, A., Hao, W., Jiang, Y. J., & Hu, Z. (2024). Preparation of PEG/P(U-AM-ChCl) composite hydrogels using ternary DES light polymerization and their properties. RSC Advances, 14(5), 2993–2999. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra08235k
  22. Li, J., Dai, Z., Usman, M., Qi, Z., & Deng, L. (2016). CO2/H2 separation by amino-acid ionic liquids with polyethylene glycol as co-solvent. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 45, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2015.12.027
  23. Li, J., Ye, Y., Chen, L., & Qi, Z. (2012). Solubilities of CO2 in poly(ethylene glycols) from (303.15 to 333.15) K. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 57(2), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1021/je201197m
  24. Li, Y., Liu, Q., Huang, W., & Yang, J. (2018). Solubilities of CO2 capture absorbents methyl benzoate, ethyl hexanoate and methyl heptanoate. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 127, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCT.2018.07.010
  25. Martins, M. A. R., Pinho, S. P., & Coutinho, J. A. P. (2019). Insights into the Nature of Eutectic and Deep Eutectic Mixtures. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 48(7), 962–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-018-0793-1
  26. Meng, X., Li, X., Shi, H., Wu, J., & Wu, Z. (2016). Density, viscosity and excess properties for binary system of 1.2-ethanediamine + polyethylene glycol 400 at T = (293.15, 298.15, 303.15, 308.15, 313.15, and 318.15) K under atmospheric pressure. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 219, 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2016.03.071
  27. Moreaux, M., Amigues, J. P., van der Meijden, G., & Withagen, C. (2024). Carbon capture: Storage vs. Utilization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102976
  28. Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Tu, Z., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., & Hu, X. (2022). Highly efficient absorption of HCl in deep eutectic solvents and their corresponding ethylene glycol blends. Chemical Engineering Journal, 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.134707
  29. Peng, D.-Y., & Robinson, D. B. (1976). A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 15(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011
  30. Pires, J. C. M., Martins, F. G., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., & Simões, M. (2011). Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(9), 1446–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2011.01.028
  31. Ringrose, P. S., Furre, A.-K., Gilfillan, S. M. V, Krevor, S., Landrø, M., Leslie, R., Meckel, T., Nazarian, B., & Zahid, A. (2024). Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Aquifers: Physicochemical Processes, Key Constraints, and Scale-Up Potential. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021, 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng
  32. Robinson, K., McCluskey, A., & Attalla, M. I. (2012). An ATR‐FTIR Study on the Effect of Molecular Structural Variations on the CO 2 Absorption Characteristics of Heterocyclic Amines, Part II. ChemPhysChem, 13(9), 2331–2341. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200066
  33. Rogelj, J., Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °c. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639).. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
  34. Singh, A., Walvekar, R., Mohammad Khalid, Wong, W. Y., & Gupta, T. C. S. M. (2018). Thermophysical properties of glycerol and polyethylene glycol (PEG 600) based DES. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 252, 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.030
  35. Song, X., Yuan, J., Yang, C., Deng, G., Wang, Z., & Gao, J. (2023). Carbon dioxide separation performance evaluation of amine-based versus choline-based deep eutectic solvents. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2023.113499
  36. Tangparitkul, S., Akamine, T., Ramadhan, R., Thanasaksukthawee, V., Tapanya, C., Tantisattayakul, T., & Kanchanapiya, P. (2025). CO2 storage infrastructure and cost estimation for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in Northern Thailand. Carbon Capture Science and Technology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100425
  37. Tripathi, S., Choudhary, S., Meena, A., & Poluri, K. M. (2023). Carbon capture, storage, and usage with microalgae: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 2085–2128.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01609-y
  38. Viveiros, F., Gaspar, J. L., Ferreira, T., & Silva, C. (2016). Hazardous indoor CO2 concentrations in volcanic environments. Environmental Pollution, 214, 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.04.086
  39. Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J., & Ramshaw, C. (2011). Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(9), 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2010.11.005
  40. Wibawa, G., F. A. Nafi, M., Permatasari, A., & Mustain, A. (2015). Application of Peng-Robinson Equation of State for Calculating Solid-Vapor and Solid-Liquid Equilibrium of CH4-CO2 System. Modern Applied Science, 9(7), 177. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n7p177
  41. Zhang, P., Yin, P., Yang, L., Cui, X., Xing, H., & Suo, X. (2024). Recent advances and challenges in ionic materials for post-combustion carbon capture. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 11, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2023.100180
  42. Zhao, K., Jia, C., Li, Z., Du, X., Wang, Y., Li, J., Yao, Z., & Yao, J. (2023). Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Carbon Capture, Transportation, Utilization, and Storage (CCTUS) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Fuel, 351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128913
  43. Zhao, Z., Dong, Y., Liu, X., Qin, X., Wu, J., Zhang, J., & Wu, Z. (2022). Density, viscosity, refractive index and molecular interaction of polyethylene glycol 400 + 1,3-propanediamine deep eutectic solvent for CO2 capture. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2022.120542
  44. Zhou, H., Wang, J., Meng, W., Wang, K., Li, G., Yang, Y., Fan, Z., Wang, D., & Ji, D. (2023). Comparative investigation of CO2-to-methanol process using different CO2 capture technologies. Fuel, 338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127359

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-04-16 09:38:38

No citation recorded.