DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62312
View PDF Download fulltext |  Supplementary Data
Supplementary data
Subject
Type Supplementary Data
  Download (182KB)    Indexing metadata

Multiple pathways to a low-carbon future: Examining evidence from the BRICS+

1Department of Economics, University of Ghana, Legon, Post Office Box LG 25, Accra, Ghana

2Department of Economics, University of Insubria, , Via Monte Generoso 71, Varese, Italy

Received: 2 Feb 2026; Revised: 15 May 2026; Accepted: 17 Jun 2026; Available online: 17 Jul 2026; Published: 1 Sep 2026.
Editor(s): Grigorios Kyriakopoulos
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the structural and distributional drivers of energy transition in BRICS+ economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE and Indonesia) over the period 1996-2023. We address the critical gap in understanding how economic and environmental factors differentially influence energy transition across varying levels of transition intensity. To account for cross-sectional dependence and endogeneity, we employ a smoothed common correlated effects instrumental variable quantile regression (CCE-IV QR) model, which robustly handles multiple endogenous regressors and unobserved global shocks. Our findings reveal that the drivers of transition are fundamentally stage dependent. The results reveal significant heterogeneity: CO₂ emissions negatively impact energy transition, particularly at lower quantiles, while GDP exhibits a positive association at median and lower quantiles but becomes insignificant at higher levels. Ecological footprint positively influences transition, whereas political stability and technological adoption yield mixed results, with the latter displaying a weakly significant positive impact. Robustness checks, including alternative specifications and subsample analyses, confirm the stability of these findings. These results necessitate a tiered policy framework. Particularly, early-transition economies should break fossil fuel lock-in through fiscal diversification and subsidy reallocation. Mid-transition economies should focus on reforming incumbent energy monopolies and financing decarbonization in hard-to-abate sectors. Advanced-transition economies need to overcome institutional fragmentation by creating cross-sectoral governance to direct investment toward grid modernization and systemic resilience. The methodological innovation of combining CCE with IV quantile regression further enhances the robustness of the analysis, addressing key econometric challenges in energy transition research.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Keywords: Energy transition analysis; CO2 emissions policies; instrumental variables; common correlated effects; quantile regression

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Mathematical model to evaluate the effect of key operating conditions on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance Effect of single-layer graphene incorporation on TiO₂ photoanodes for enhanced photovoltaic performance of chlorophyll-based dye-sensitized solar cells Tea (Camellia sinensis) processing residues: Thermochemical characterization of stalks and off-grade leaves for renewable energy More recent articles
Most cited articles
Automatic and Online Detection of Rotor Fault State Power Quality Improvement Wind Energy System Using Cascaded Multilevel Inverter Modeling and PSO optimization of Humidifier-Dehumidifier desalination Wind Power Generation in India: Evolution, Trends and Prospects Improving Stability and Convergence for Adaptive Radial Basis Function Neural Networks Algorithm. (On-Line Harmonics Estimation Application) More cited articles
  1. Amri, F. (2017). Intercourse across economic growth, trade and renewable energy consumption in developing and developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  3. Aryanpur, V., Fattahi, M., Mamipour, S., Ghahremani, M., Gallachóir, B. Ó., Bazilian, M. D., & Glynn, J. (2022). How energy subsidy reform can drive the Iranian power sector towards a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 169, 113190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113190
  4. Attílio, L. A. (2025). Impact of renewable energy on exchange rates in a system of open economies. International Economics, 184, 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100647
  5. Azhgaliyeva, D., Liu, Y., & Liddle, B. (2020). An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instruments. Energy Policy, 145, 111773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111773
  6. Aziz, N., Mihardjo, L. W., Sharif, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The role of tourism and renewable energy in testing the environmental Kuznets curve in the BRICS countries: Fresh evidence from methods of moments quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(31), 39427–39441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10011-y
  7. Babayomi, O. O., Dahoro, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Affordable clean energy transition in developing countries: Pathways and technologies. iScience, 25(5), 104178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104178
  8. Baker, L., Newell, P., & Phillips, J. (2014). The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa. New Political Economy, 19(6), 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.849674
  9. Bataille, C. G. F. (2020). Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. WIREs Climate Change, 11(2), e633. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.633
  10. Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2006). Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.009
  11. Cherp, A., Jewell, J., & Goldthau, A. (2011). Governing Global Energy: Systems, Transitions, Complexity. Global Policy, 2(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00059.x
  12. Chovancová, J., Petruška, I., Rovňák, M., & Barlák, J. (2024). Investigating the drivers of CO2 emissions in the EU: Advanced estimation with common correlated effects and common factors models. Energy Reports, 11, 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.057
  13. Coady, D., Parry, I. W. H., Le, N.-P., & Shang, B. (2019). Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates. IMF Working Papers, 2019(089). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393178.001.A001
  14. Cugat, G., & Manera, A. (2024). Do Capital Inflows Spur Technology Diffusion? Evidence from a New Technology Adoption Index (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4750176). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400270000.001
  15. D’Haultfœuille, X., Hoderlein, S., & Sasaki, Y. (2024). Testing and relaxing the exclusion restriction in the control function approach. Journal of Econometrics, 240(2), 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.012
  16. Edenhofer, O., Madruga, R. P., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., & Stechow, C. von. (2012). Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Choice Reviews Online, 49(11), 49-6309-49–6309. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.49-6309
  17. Ergun, S. J., & Rivas, M. F. (2023). Does higher income lead to more renewable energy consumption? Evidence from emerging-Asian countries. Heliyon, 9(1), e13049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13049
  18. Fitzenberger, B., & Wilke, R. A. (2015). Quantile Regression Methods
  19. Galvao, A. F. (2011). Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.02.016
  20. Gerasimchuk, W. I., Kühne, K., Roth, J., Oharenko, Y., Bridle, R., & Garg, V. (2019). Beyond Fossil Fuels: Fiscal transition in BRICS
  21. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  22. Harding, M., & Lamarche, C. (2014). Estimating and testing a quantile regression model with interactive effects. Journal of Econometrics, 178, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.010
  23. Hlongwane, N. W., Khobai, H., Hlongwane, N. W., & Khobai, H. (2025). The Impact of the Renewable Energy Transition on Economic Growth in BRICS Nations. Energies, 18(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164318
  24. Huang, Y. W., Kittner, N., & Kammen, D. M. (2019). ASEAN grid flexibility: Preparedness for grid integration of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 128, 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.025
  25. IEA. (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. Abu Dhabi. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ed1e4c42-5726-4269-b801-97b3d32e117c/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf
  26. Jie, H., Khan, I., Alharthi, M., Zafar, M. W., & Saeed, A. (2023). Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Utilities Policy, 81, 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101490
  27. Jin, X., Xu, R., Farooq, U., Tabash, M. I., & Aljughaiman, A. A. (2024). How do inflation rate and energy alternatives influence environmental quality? A BRICS analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101369
  28. Kaplan, D. M., & Sun, Y. (2017). SMOOTHED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES QUANTILE REGRESSION. Econometric Theory, 33(1), 105–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466615000407
  29. Karasmanaki, E., Arabatzis, G., Tsantopoulos, G. (2025). Citizens and Energy Transition: Understanding the Role of Perceived Barriers and Information Sources. Energies 2025, 18(18), 4984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184984
  30. Kessides, I. (2020). The Decline and Fall of Eskom: A South African Tragedy
  31. Knutsen, C. H. (2012). Democracy and economic growth: A survey of arguments and results. International Area Studies Review, 15(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865912455268
  32. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098
  33. Korppoo, A., & Alisson, A. (2025). RUSSIA’S NON-WESTERN CLIMATE COALITION - Genuine Consensus or Just Hot Air? Climate Strategies
  34. Lau, C. K., Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M. K., Patel, G., & Li, J. (2023). Introducing a new measure of energy transition: Green quality of energy mix and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 122, 106702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106702
  35. Li, R., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2022). Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131207
  36. Machado, J. A. F., & Silva, J. M. C. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
  37. Montrone, L., Ohlendorf, N., & Chandra, R. (2021). The political economy of coal in India – Evidence from expert interviews. Energy for Sustainable Development, 61, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.02.003
  38. Moran, P. A. P. (1950). NOTES ON CONTINUOUS STOCHASTIC PHENOMENA. Biometrika, 37(1–2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
  39. Michailidis, M., Zafeiriou, E., Kantartzis, A., Galatsidas, S., Arabatzis, G. (2025). Governance, Energy Policy, and Sustainable Development: Renewable Energy Infrastructure Transition in Developing MENA Countries. Energies, 2025, 18(11), 2759. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2759
  40. Navarro, S. (2010). Control Functions. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), Microeconometrics (pp. 20–28). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280816_4
  41. Ojekemi, O. S., Ağa, M., Magazzino, C., Ojekemi, O. S., Ağa, M., & Magazzino, C. (2023). Towards Achieving Sustainability in the BRICS Economies: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Risk. Energies, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145287
  42. Özkan, O., & Destek, M. A. (2025). Assessing energy transition effectiveness in CO2 emission reduction: A novel indicator for BRIC nations. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100773
  43. Padovezi, A., Ludvig, A., Weiss, G., Chazdon, R. L., Rogelja, T., Adams, C., & Secco, L. (2025). Unravelling Brazil’s approach: Policy and governance gaps for social innovation in forest and landscape restoration. Land Use Policy, 155, 107583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107583
  44. Pedroni, P. (2004). PANEL COINTEGRATION: ASYMPTOTIC AND FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF POOLED TIME SERIES TESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PPP HYPOTHESIS. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
  45. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
  46. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  47. Rasoulinezhad, E., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Sung, J., & Panthamit, N. (2020). Geopolitical Risk and Energy Transition in Russia: Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Method. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072689
  48. Rehman, S. U., Qingren, C. A. O., Ahmed, S., & Farooq, M. S. (2018). Application of the public-private partnership model to sustainable irrigation system in Pakistan. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Energy Conservation and Efficiency (ICECE) (pp. 49-60). IEEE
  49. Ribeiro, L. C. D. S., Filho, J. F. D. S., Santos, G. F. D., & Freitas, L. F. D. S. (2023). Structural decomposition analysis of Brazilian greenhouse gas emissions. World Development Sustainability, 2, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100067
  50. Sachan, A., & SenGupta, S. (2025). Climate Financing and FDI Impacts on Renewable Energy Consumption for Sustainable Development in BRICS+. Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70214
  51. Seiler, A. A., Brown, H., & Matthews, S. (2023). The JETPs of South Africa and Indonesia
  52. Smith, M. G., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). The Effect of Feed-in Tariffs on Renewable Electricity Generation: An Instrumental Variables Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9684-5
  53. Solarin, S. A., Bello, M. O., & Tiwari, A. K. (2022). The impact of technological innovation on renewable energy production: Accounting for the roles of economic and environmental factors using a method of moments quantile regression. Heliyon, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09913
  54. Staffell, I., Scamman, D., Abad, A. V., Balcombe, P., Dodds, P. E., Ekins, P., Shah, N., & Ward, K. R. (2019). The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy & Environmental Science, 12(2), 463–491. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01157E
  55. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2020). Analyzing Energy Transition Patterns in Asia: Evidence From Countries With Different Income Levels. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00162
  56. Timmons, D., Harris, J. M., & Roach, B. (2014). The Economics of Renewable Energy
  57. Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
  58. Urpelainen, J., Yang, J., & Liu, D. (2018). Power Sector Reforms and Technical Performance: Good News from an Instrumental Variable Analysis. Review of Policy Research, 35(1), 120–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12275
  59. Voigt, S., De Cian, E., Schymura, M., & Verdolini, E. (2014). Energy intensity developments in 40 major economies: Structural change or technology improvement? Energy Economics, 41, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.015
  60. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.420
  61. Ye, W., Chaiyapa, W., & Li, Y. (2024). A comparative study of energy governance on energy resilience: Process tracing of China and Thailand’s solar power development. Energy Strategy Reviews, 55, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101500
  62. Yermakov, V. (2025). Fiscal Flex: Russia’s oil and gas revenues in 2024. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/fiscal-flex-russias-oil-and-gas-revenues-in-2024/
  63. Yu, Z., & Guo, X. (2023). Influencing factors of green energy transition: The role of economic policy uncertainty, technology innovation, and ecological governance in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1058967
  64. Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A. (2024). Clean energy production index and CO2 emissions in OECD countries. Science of The Total Environment, 907, 167852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167852

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-20 17:52:43

No citation recorded.