DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62318
View PDF Download fulltext

Assessing energy policy effectiveness in Vietnam using multi-criteria decision making

1Faculty of Political Science, Academy of Journalism and Communication, Ha Noi, Viet Nam

2Institute of Engineering, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

3Logistics Centre, Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

4 Institute of Maritime, Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

View all affiliations
Received: 28 Nov 2025; Revised: 20 Jan 2026; Accepted: 10 Feb 2026; Available online: 28 Feb 2026; Published: 1 May 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Vietnam's energy transition is strong, and therefore, Vietnam needs a policy framework appropriate to the current context to promote this sustainable transition. This study assesses energy policy alternatives in Vietnam in order to identify the best policy strategies for sustainable energy transition by using a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach. The research basically applies a DEMATEL-VIKOR framework to discuss five policy alternatives: Renewable Energy Promotion (RP), Energy Efficiency and Demand-Side Management (EE&DSM), Grid Modernization (GM), Fossil Fuel Transition (FFT), and Institutional, Regulatory and Market Reform (IR). Seven criteria, from Economic Efficiency (EE) to Policy Consistency (PC), were used for evaluation. The analysis by DEMATEL points to the Institutional and Regulatory Effectiveness (IE) as being the most crucial causal driver with the highest prominence score of 3.84 and a net causality value of 0.53. These results give direct information to the VIKOR analysis, where IR (A5) is the best compromise solution with a perfect Q-index value of 0.00 and the lowest individual regret (R-index) value of 0.08. In comparison, Fossil Fuel Transition (FFT) ranked the worst with a Q-index of 1.00. Sensitivity analysis to prove the robustness of IR as the dominant policy for all decision-making parameters (v). The results have illustrated that the energy policy of Vietnam should place more emphasis on institutional strengthening and grid modernization (Q = 0.22) than stand-alone technological deployment to ensure a stable, efficient, and equitable energy transition.

Keywords: Vietnamese policy; Sustainable transition; Energy policy; VIKOR; DEMATEL; Multi-criteria decision making approach

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Foreign direct investment, renewable energy and governance in major copper- and lithium-mining countries Towards low-carbon and net-zero energy temperature control in winter cricket farming using a hybrid PV/T–heat pump system Immobilized L-arginine on methacrylate polymer as reusable heterogeneous catalyst for crude palm oil transesterification The effect of different surface functionalization of SBA-15 catalysts on the production of C16 bio-aviation fuel precursor Chemically activated biochar derived from mangrove litter with enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity for carbon sequestration Nickel-vanadium impregnated to hydrotalcite for hydrocracking of waste cooking oil More recent articles
Most cited articles
Biogas Production from Cow Manure Incorporating Root Crops under Agro-Forestry as the Newly Potential Source of Food, Feed and Renewable Energy Effects on NOx and SO2 Emissions during Co-Firing of Coal With Woody Biomass in Air Staging and Reburning Performance evaluation of common rail direct injection (CRDI) engine fuelled with Uppage Oil Methyl Ester (UOME) Electricity from Wind for Off-Grid Applications in Bangladesh: A Techno-Economic Assessment More cited articles
  1. Al-Atesh, E. A. A., Rahmawati, Y., Wan Zawawi, N. A. B., & Elmansoury, A. (2021). Developing the Green Building Materials Selection Criteria for Sustainable Building Projects. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(5 SE-Articles), 2112–2120. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.5.14364
  2. ASEAN Energy Cooperation. (2025). Net-Zero Roadmap for Vietnam’s Steel Industry. https://aseanenergy.org/publications/net-zero-roadmap-for-vietnams-steel-industry
  3. Candra Sari, R., Wahyu Dewanti, P., Fajar, M. A., Priantinah, D., & Pranesti, A. (2022). Development of Early Startup Companies’ Valuation Model Based on Android Mobile Application: The Angel Investor’s Perspective. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 6(2), 382. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.2.992
  4. Carson, R. T., Lu, J., Khossravi, E. A., Köhlin, G., Sterner, E., Sterner, T., & Whittington, D. (2025). The public’s views on climate policies in seven large global south countries. Nature Climate Change, 15(9), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02389-9
  5. Dat, H., Tam, T., Hoang, T., Truong, O., & Phuong, H. (2025). A Fuzzy AHP – ANP Approach for Prioritizing Criteria to Develop a Green Shipping Corridor in Vietnam. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 9(November), 2584–2593. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.9.6.4891
  6. Derouez, F., & Ifa, A. (2025). Assessing the Sustainability of Southeast Asia’s Energy Transition: A Comparative Analysis. Energies, 18(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020287
  7. Dincer, H., & Yuksel, S. (2019). IT2-Based Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Approach to Soft Computing. IEEE Access, 7, 15932–15944. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895359
  8. Do, T. N., Burke, P. J., Nguyen, H. N., Overland, I., Suryadi, B., Swandaru, A., & Yurnaidi, Z. (2021). Vietnam’s solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries. Energy for Sustainable Development, 65, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002
  9. Droege, P. (2011). Urban Energy Transition From Fossil Fuels to Renewable Power Edited by World Council for Renewable Energy. Elsevier
  10. Febrina, S., Aimon, H., Kurniadi, A. P., & Marta, J. (2025). Assessing the Role of the Blue Economy in Strengthening Food Security: Evidence from Lower-Middle-Income ASEAN Countries. Challenges in Sustainability, 13(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130108
  11. Gadaleta, G., Notarnicola, M., & De Gisi, S. (2023). The Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam: An Environmental and Technological Analysis of Current and Future Scenarios. Sustainability, 15(24), 16658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416658
  12. Gooneratne, F., & Pokhrel, S. (2010). Energy Conservation Policy Development in Vietnam (pp. 355–381). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812771780_0013
  13. Gverdtsiteli, G. (2023). Authoritarian environmentalism in Vietnam: The construction of climate change as a security threat. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.004
  14. Hoai Thuong, M. T., Phuong Dung, N., & Hong Yen, N. T. (2025). Policy and Challenges on the Renewable Energy Transition Amidst Climate Change: A Case Study of Vietnam. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 19(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2025/2/7
  15. Hoang, A. T., Huang, Z. H., Nižetić, S., Pandey, A., Nguyen, X. P., Luque, R., Ong, H. C., Said, Z., Le, T. H., & Pham, V. V. (2022). Characteristics of hydrogen production from steam gasification of plant-originated lignocellulosic biomass and its prospects in Vietnam. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(7), 4394–4425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.091
  16. Hoang, A. T., Pandey, A., Lichtfouse, E., Bui, V. G., Veza, I., Nguyen, H. L., & Nguyen, X. P. (2023). Green hydrogen economy: Prospects and policies in Vietnam. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(80), 31049–31062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.306
  17. Hosseini, M. B., & Tarokh, M. J. (2013). Type-2 fuzzy set extension of DEMATEL method combined with perceptual computing for decision making. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-712X-9-10
  18. Hung, N. T. (2023). Remittance, Renewable Energy, and CO2 Emissions: a Vietnamese Illustration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01238-4
  19. Huong, T. T., Shah, I. H., & Park, H.-S. (2021). Decarbonization of Vietnam’s economy: decomposing the drivers for a low-carbon growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10481-0
  20. Huong To, M., & Minh Tran, B. (2025). Environmental regulatory stringency and corporate reporting quality: Evidence from waste, emissions, water, and energy regulations in Vietnamese firms. Environmental Economics, 16(3), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(3).2025.05
  21. Huyen, C. T. T. (2025). Review of policies to support the development of renewable energy projects in Vietnam. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 7(9), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0709461467
  22. Karagiannidis, A., Wittmaier, M., Langer, S., Bilitewski, B., & Malamakis, A. (2009). Thermal processing of waste organic substrates: Developing and applying an integrated framework for feasibility assessment in developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(8), 2156–2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.035
  23. Kou, G., Olgu Akdeniz, Ö., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00256-y
  24. Kucuk, M., & Mohammad, R. (2025). Comparative analysis of renewable energy policies in Southeast Asia: Toward a regional energy governance framework. Euroasia Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 12(4), 75–92
  25. Le, T. T., Sharma, P., Osman, S. M., Dzida, M., Nguyen, P. Q. P., Tran, M. H., Cao, D. N., & Tran, V. D. (2024). Forecasting energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of Vietnam by prognostic models based on explainable machine learning and time series. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02852-9
  26. Liu, H., Chau, K. Y., Duong, N. T., & Hoang, N.-K. (2024). Fintech, financial inclusion, mineral resources and environmental quality. An economic advancement perspective from China and Vietnam. Resources Policy, 89, 104636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104636
  27. Morelli, G., & Mele, M. (2020). Energy consumption, CO2 and economic growth nexus in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(2), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8248
  28. Nasir, M. H., Wen, J., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., Igharo, A. E., Musibau, H. O., & Waqas, M. (2022). Energy Security and Energy Poverty in Emerging Economies: A Step Towards Sustainable Energy Efficiency. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.834614
  29. Nguyen, A. T., & Poczta-Wajda, A. (2024). The relationship between Foreign Direct Investment, trade openness, exchange rate, and Gross Domestic Product per capita in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Management, 46, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2024.46.08
  30. Nguyen, D. N., Van Nguyen, D., Nguyen, D. D., Than, T. T., & Tran, L. X. (2025). How do energy price, energy-saving policies, and crisis affect energy-saving behavior? Heliyon, 11(4), e42787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42787
  31. Nguyen, H. H., Bui, V. G., Le, K. B., Nguyen, V. T., & Hoang, A. T. (2025). Economic-environmental analysis of solar-wind-biomass hybrid renewable energy system for hydrogen production: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 14(3), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.61233
  32. Nguyen, H. P., Hoang, A. T., Le, A. T., Pham, V. V., & Tran, V. N. (2024). Learned experiences from the policy and roadmap of advanced countries for the strategic orientation to electric vehicles: A case study in Vietnam. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 46(1), 15567–15576. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1811432
  33. Nguyen, L. T., Duong, K. T., & Nguyen, M. D. (2025). Factors influencing public acceptance of wind power project development in Vietnam. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 28(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/205276
  34. Nguyen, O. T. K., Buertey, S., Pham, T. H., Van Nguyen, D., & Tan, P. D. (2025). Environmental disclosure and firm financial performance in Vietnam’s manufacturing and energy sectors. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02195-5
  35. Nguyen, V. G., Sharma, P., Bora, B. J., Bui, T. M. T., Efremov, C., Tran, M. H., Kowalski, J., Osman, S. M., Cao, D. N., & Dong, V. H. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid energy system for electrification using an off-grid solar/biogas/battery system employing HOMER: A case study in Vietnam. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 191, 1353–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.09.046
  36. Nguyen, X. P., Le, N. D., Pham, V. V., Huynh, T. T., Dong, V. H., & Hoang, A. T. (2025). Mission, challenges, and prospects of renewable energy development in Vietnam. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 47(1), 10367–10379. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2021.1965264
  37. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
  38. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
  39. Pairan, M. A., Zamri, N., & Ismail, A. (2023). Assessment of Water in Terengganu River, Malaysia Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques and Fuzzy DEMATEL. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(4 SE-Articles), 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.4.17894
  40. Pham, D. T., Pham, H. Van, & Dang, T. Q. (2023). Renewable Energy Consumption, Energy Efficiency, Trade, Economic Development and FDI on Climate Change in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(6), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14571
  41. Phuong Nguyen, M., & Nguyen, N. (2025a). Impact of policy instruments for solar energy development in Vietnam. GATR Journal of Business and Economics Review, 10(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2025.10.1(1)
  42. Phuong Nguyen, M., & Nguyen, N. (2025b). The impact of policy instruments promoting solar energy development in Vietnam. Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding, 17(1), 131–131. https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2025.1(131)
  43. Piech, M., & Sobczyk, W. (2025). Energy Transformation in Poland and Vietnam: Challenges and Opportunities for Integrating Renewable Energy in Coal Dependent Countries. Inżynieria Mineralna, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29227/IM-2025-02-83
  44. Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Štreimikienė, D., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection. Sustainability, 12(10), 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104278
  45. Rehman, I. H., Sreekumar, A., Gill, B., & Worrell, E. (2017). Accelerating access to energy services: Way forward. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.03.003
  46. Ridho, Z., & Paksi, A. K. (2025). The ASEAN’s Green Trade Policy in Response to EU CBAM: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Vietnam. BIO Web of Conferences, 199, 02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519902006
  47. Selvakkumaran, S., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2013). Energy security and co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in three Asian countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.004
  48. Shem, C., Simsek, Y., Hutfilter, U. F., & Urmee, T. (2019). Potentials and opportunities for low carbon energy transition in Vietnam: A policy analysis. Energy Policy, 134, 110818
  49. Son, P. T., & Voropai, N. (2015). The major outage in South Vietnam in 2013: the nature of blackout, security measures and strategy of national power system modernization. International Conference on Problem of Critical Structures, 177–182
  50. Sudirman, L., Nurlaily, N., & Jaya, F. (2025). Comparing Solar Energy Investment Policies: Legal Perspectives from Indonesia and Vietnam. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 25(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.26244
  51. Thai Hung, N. T., & Thanh Tu, D. T. (2025). Bond Financing and Green Credit in Renewable Energy: Evidence and Policy Implications from Vietnam. Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research, 02(06). https://doi.org/10.55677/GJEFR/08-2025-Vol02E6
  52. Thi, L. N., Dat, M. N., & Trung, K. D. (2025). Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Literature Review. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4411
  53. Thi Mai, A. N., Xuan, V. N., Mai, H. Le, Xuan, H. P., & Thi Phuong, T. N. (2024). Population, carbon dioxide emissions and renewable energy consumption nexus: New insights from Vietnam. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 42(5), 1763–1798. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987241252453
  54. Thuy, V. T. H., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2015). Analyses of Energy use and CO2 Emission in Residential Sector: Case Studies in Thailand and Vietnam. Energy Procedia, 79, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.488
  55. Truong, N. T. A., Khanh, N. B., Giap, L. N., Trung, B. T., Le, N. P., & Vinh, T. T. (2024). Feasibility Analysis of Wind Power Plant in South East Region, Vietnam. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(4), 15779–15783. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7849
  56. Ullah, S., Nadeem, M., Ali, K., & Abbas, Q. (2022). Fossil fuel, industrial growth and inward FDI impact on CO 2 emissions in Vietnam: testing the EKC hypothesis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2021-0051
  57. Vo, D. H., Vo, A. T., & Ho, C. M. (2024a). Understanding the characteristics of the household energy transition in a developing country. Heliyon, 10(1), e23977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23977
  58. Vo, D. H., Vo, A. T., & Ho, C. M. (2024b). Urbanization and renewable energy consumption in the emerging ASEAN markets: A comparison between short and long-run effects. Heliyon, 10(9), e30243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30243
  59. Wang, C.-N., Dang, T.-T., Nguyen, N.-A.-T., & Wang, J.-W. (2022). A combined Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Grey Based Multiple Criteria Decision Making (G-MCDM) for solar PV power plants site selection: A case study in Vietnam. Energy Reports, 8, 1124–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.045
  60. Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, H.-K., & Nhieu, N.-L. (2025). Optimizing Energy Choices: MEREC-TOPSIS Analysis of Renewable Technologies. Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11157-y
  61. Wasilewski, A., Juszczyszyn, K., & Suryani, V. (2024). Multi-factor evaluation of clustering methods for e-commerce application. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 28, 100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2024.100562
  62. Wei, Y.-M. (2025). A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for the Strategic Evaluation of Business Development Models. Information, 16(6), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060454

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-04-15 17:12:11

No citation recorded.