DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62335
View PDF Download fulltext

Two-stage gradient-pore microporous layers for enhanced energy production and durability in PEM fuel cells

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mutah University, P.O Box 7, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan

Received: 15 Dec 2025; Revised: 29 Jan 2026; Accepted: 18 Feb 2026; Available online: 28 Feb 2026; Published: 1 May 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Coupled mass, heat, and water transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) critically depend on the microporous layer (MPL), but traditional uniform-pore MPLs are restricted by inherent trade-offs between the accessibility of reactants and the removal of liquid-water. This work presents a two-stage gradient-pore MPL structure and demonstrates its efficiency in terms of a fully coupled, non-isothermal Multiphysics modelling framework, the solution presented is theory-based and mitigates the classical trade-off between gas transport and liquid-water management by introducing a staged pore/porosity architecture that improves oxygen accessibility while promoting directional water evacuation. The proposed design uses a step-pore-size and porosity distribution throughout the MPL thickness to apply a directional capillary pressure gradient so that selective evacuation of water can occur to maintain catalyst-layer hydration. The optimized design is 12 to 18% more peak power density, 10 to 15% higher cell voltage (high current densities 1.5 A.cm-1 and higher), and 30% less cathode liquid saturation than a conventional MPL operating under the same conditions. Thermal analysis also shows that there was 25-35% decrease in temperature non-uniformity, which shows better homogeneity in current density and means that the hotspots causing degradation were caused to fail. Operating-regime mapping validates a strong transition between a transport-limited and optimal performance space, exhibiting increased robustness over a broad operating span. Such findings make pore-gradient engineering a physically based and scalable optimization strategy of improving energy production, thermal stability and durability of next-generation PEM fuel cells concurrently.

Keywords: Two-stage gradient-pore microporous layer; Multiphysics transport optimization; Water and thermal management; Durability-oriented electrode design.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Immobilized L-arginine on methacrylate polymer as reusable heterogeneous catalyst for crude palm oil transesterification Foreign direct investment, renewable energy and governance in major copper- and lithium-mining countries Towards low-carbon and net-zero energy temperature control in winter cricket farming using a hybrid PV/T–heat pump system The effect of different surface functionalization of SBA-15 catalysts on the production of C16 bio-aviation fuel precursor Development of an isothermal CO2 absorption process using DMC and PEG400 for carbon capture and storage technology Chemically activated biochar derived from mangrove litter with enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity for carbon sequestration More recent articles
Most cited articles
Thermal Performance Improvement of the Heat Pipe by Employing Dolomite/Ethylene Glycol Nanofluid Modeling and PSO optimization of Humidifier-Dehumidifier desalination Performance Analysis of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms Under Varying Irradiation Melting Behavior of Phase Change Material in a Solar Vertical Thermal Energy Storage with Variable Length Fins added on the Heat Transfer Tube Surfaces The Performance of A Diesel Engine Fueled With Diesel Oil, Biodiesel and Preheated Coconut Oil More cited articles
  1. Al-Falahat, A., & Alrwashdeh, S. S. (2025). Theoretical dissection of water management paradigms in PEM fuel cells: Comparative insights into cutting-edge flow field channel designs for resolving hydrodynamic challenges [Article]. Results in Engineering, 27, Article 105766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105766
  2. Alaefour, I., Shahgaldi, S., Zhao, J., & Li, X. (2021). Synthesis and Ex-Situ characterizations of diamond-like carbon coatings for metallic bipolar plates in PEM fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(19), 11059-11070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.259
  3. Alrwashdeh, S. S. (2026). Microporous layer (MPL) material structural modifications for enhanced efficiency and durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs): Toward sustainable maritime energy solutions. Next Materials, 11, Article 101629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.101629
  4. Alrwashdeh, S. S., Al-Falahat, A. M., Markötter, H., & Manke, I. (2022). Visualization of water accumulation in micro porous layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using synchrotron phase contrast tomography [Article]. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 6, Article 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100260
  5. Alrwashdeh, S. S., Alsaraireh, F. M., Saraireh, M. A., Markötter, H., Kardjilov, N., Klages, M., Scholta, J., & Manke, I. (2018). In-situ investigation of water distribution in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using high-resolution neutron tomography with 6.5 μm pixel size [Article]. AIMS Energy, 6(4), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2018.4.607
  6. Alrwashdeh, S. S., Manke, I., Markötter, H., Haußmann, J., Arlt, T., Hilger, A., Al-Falahat, A. M., Klages, M., Scholta, J., & Banhart, J. (2017). Improved Performance of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells with Modified Microporous Layer Structures. Energy Technology, 5(9), 1612-1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700005
  7. Alrwashdeh, S. S., Manke, I., Markötter, H., Klages, M., Göbel, M., Haußmann, J., Scholta, J., & Banhart, J. (2017). In Operando Quantification of Three-Dimensional Water Distribution in Nanoporous Carbon-Based Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells [Article]. ACS Nano, 11(6), 5944-5949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01720
  8. Alrwashdeh, S. S., Markötter, H., Haußmann, J., Scholta, J., Hilger, A., & Manke, I. (2016). X-ray tomographic investigation of water distribution in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with different gas diffusion media. ECS Transactions, 72, 99; https://doi.org/10.1149/07208.0099ecst
  9. Bazylak, A. (2009). Liquid water visualization in PEM fuel cells: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(9), 3845-3857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.084
  10. Birgersson, E., & Vynnycky, M. (2006). A quantitative study of the effect of flow-distributor geometry in the cathode of a PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 153(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.211
  11. Borup, R. L., Kusoglu, A., Neyerlin, K. C., Mukundan, R., Ahluwalia, R. K., Cullen, D. A., More, K. L., Weber, A. Z., & Myers, D. J. (2020). Recent developments in catalyst-related PEM fuel cell durability. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 21, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.007
  12. Ćalasan, M. (2025). A secant-based approach for inverse current-voltage modeling of PEMFCs: A robust alternative to Newton and iterative Lambert W methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 172, 151316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151316
  13. Chen, M., Dong, W., Chen, Q., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Wang, X., Xia, C., Wang, H., & Wang, B. (2024). K doped LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2-δ electrode for solid oxide fuel cells operating at low temperatures down to 350 °C. Chemical Engineering Journal, 502, 158034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158034
  14. Chen, Z., Dang, C., Tan, X., Li, C., Ha, C., Qin, J., & Cheng, W. (2026). Performance and exergy analysis of a NaBH4/Al coupled hydrolysis hydrogen production solid oxide fuel cell hybrid turbofan system with integrated water circulation. Renewable Energy, 261, 125219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125219
  15. Chowdury, M. S. K., Park, S. B., & Park, Y.-i. (2026). Synergistic acid–base interactions enabling stable proton transfer in PEMFCs: insights from simulations and experiments. Applied Surface Science, 720, 165152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.165152
  16. Feng, P., Li, Z., Liu, L., Tan, L., & Zhang, Y. (2026). Improving PEMFC performance with gradient porosity GDL designs: A multiscale simulation study. Renewable Energy, 256, 124467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.124467
  17. Genidy, A., Léau, M., Nelson-Gruel, D., Ketfi-Chérif, A., Von-Wissel, D., & Colin, G. (2025). Enhancing Fuel-Cell Longevity via Multi-Objective Dynamic Programming. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 59(5), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.085
  18. Gomaa, M. R., Al-Bawwat, A. a. K., Al-Dhaifallah, M., Rezk, H., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Optimal design and economic analysis of a hybrid renewable energy system for powering and desalinating seawater. Energy Reports, 9, 2473-2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.087
  19. Gostick, J. T., Ioannidis, M. A., Fowler, M. W., & Pritzker, M. D. (2009). Wettability and capillary behavior of fibrous gas diffusion media for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 194(1), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.052
  20. Hasan, M. N., Ishraque, M. F., Shezan, S. A., Kamwa, I., Ahmad, K., Alrwaili, A., Alruwaili, M., Amin, N., & Ahmad, N. (2026). Hydrogen and fuel cells as the cornerstones of the universal energy transfer – A comprehensive review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 209, 153486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153486
  21. Hou, Q., Ge, P., Lu, G., & Zhang, H. (2022). A novel PEMFC-CHP system for methanol reforming as fuel purified by hydrogen permeation alloy membrane. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 36, 102176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102176
  22. Hu, T., Yang, Z., Zheng, W., Li, H., Liu, W., & Zhu, Q. (2026). Performance enhancement through integrated design of assembly pressure and porosity of gas diffusion layer for HT-PEMFC based on coupled electrochemical–thermal–mechanical modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 350, 120939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120939
  23. Huang, Z., An, Z., Yang, D., Zhang, D., & Ding, Y. (2025). Effect of emulsification of catalyst ink on the structure of catalyst layer in PEMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 183, 151830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151830
  24. Ince, U. U., Markötter, H., George, M. G., Liu, H., Ge, N., Lee, J., Alrwashdeh, S. S., Zeis, R., Messerschmidt, M., Scholta, J., Bazylak, A., & Manke, I. (2018). Effects of compression on water distribution in gas diffusion layer materials of PEMFC in a point injection device by means of synchrotron X-ray imaging. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(1), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.047
  25. Kim, S., Lee, H., Kim, C., Jang, I., Lee, K., Sun, S., Lee, D., Kim, J., Park, K., Lee, G., Jeong, H., Yoon, H., Paik, U., & Song, T. (2022). Interface-reinforcing sintering step for highly stable operation of proton-conducting fuel cell stack. Journal of Power Sources, 548, 232082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232082
  26. Lan, Q., Fan, L., Wen, L., Gu, Y., Wu, Y., & Li, J. (2022). Multi-factors of fuel injection pressure peak of the pressure amplification common rail fuel system for two-stroke diesel engines. Fuel, 321, 124046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124046
  27. Li, S., Sang, X., Zhu, Z., Jiang, W., Wang, W., Li, C., & Wang, X. (2026). Parametric analysis and energy efficiency optimization control of integrated thermal management system with waste heat utilization for fuel cell vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 204, 153037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.153037
  28. Li, T., Bao, Z., Yao, R., Pan, X., Bai, F., Peng, Z., Jiao, K., & Liu, Z. (2025). Two-phase flow in the gas diffusion layer with different perforation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Green Energy, 22(6), 1063-1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2024.2347269
  29. Lv, B., & Pan, C. (2026). Research on optimization of PEMFC stack compression pressure based on mechanical-electrochemical coupling model. Fuel, 412, 138078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.138078
  30. Ma, T., Jing, G., Hu, C., Qin, Y., & Sun, X. (2025). Research on the mechanisms of contact resistance and structural deformation impact on PEMFC performance. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 74, 106845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106845
  31. Owejan, J. P., Gagliardo, J. J., Sergi, J. M., Kandlikar, S. G., & Trabold, T. A. (2009). Water management studies in PEM fuel cells, Part I: Fuel cell design and in situ water distributions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(8), 3436-3444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.100
  32. Owejan, J. P., & Goebel, S. G. (2021). Performance evaluation of porous gas channel ribs in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 494, 229740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229740
  33. Park, S., Kim, M.-H., & Um, S. (2024). Phase separation modeling of water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using the Multiple-Relaxation-Time lattice Boltzmann method. Chemical Engineering Journal, 495, 153629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153629
  34. Pasaogullari, U., & Wang, C.-Y. (2004). Two-phase transport and the role of micro-porous layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 49(25), 4359-4369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.027
  35. Radica, G., Tolj, I., Nyamsi, S. N., & Vidović, T. (2025). Performances of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in marine application. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 142, 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.289
  36. Ren, G., Qu, Z., Niu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). Advancing Porous Electrode Design for PEM Fuel Cells: From Physics to Artificial Intelligence. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-025-00243-2
  37. Shi, X., Jiao, D., Bao, Z., Jiao, K., Chen, W., & Liu, Z. (2022). Liquid transport in gas diffusion layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Effects of micro-porous layer cracks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(9), 6247-6258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.248
  38. Song, K., Li, Y., Huang, P., Ma, H., Huang, X., Yu, Q., Fang, Z., Yang, Z., & Mu, J. (2026). Experimentation, analysis, and evaluation of voltage consistency for open cathode air-cooled PEMFC stacks under different operating conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 209, 153549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153549
  39. Wang, A., & Chen, L. (2026). Multi-objective joint optimization for methanol reforming hydrogen fuel cell hybrid power system on a tugboat. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 214, 153639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153639
  40. Wang, S., Ha, C., Li, C., Leng, S., Xu, S., Li, C., Xiu, X., Dang, C., Wang, C., & Qin, J. (2025). Performance evaluation of a biodiesel-methanol dual-fuel high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell cogeneration system for marine applications. Energy, 337, 138610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138610
  41. Wang, X., Wu, Y., Cai, H., Jin, Z., Qu, Z., & Tao, W. (2024). Achieving triple improvements in intrinsic properties for porous flow field materials and the proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrochemical performance. Journal of Power Sources, 604, 234508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234508
  42. Wang, X. L., Qu, Z. G., & Ren, G. F. (2023). Collective enhancement in hydrophobicity and electrical conductivity of gas diffusion layer and the electrochemical performance of PEMFCs. Journal of Power Sources, 575, 233077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233077
  43. Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Xia, Z. (2025). Effects of channel-land configuration on temperature-driven water transport in cathode gas diffusion layer of PEMFC. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 65, 105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105601
  44. Yang, J., Chen, L., Wu, X., Deng, P., Xue, F., Xu, X., Wang, W., & Hu, H. (2025). Remaining useful life prediction of vehicle-oriented PEMFCs based on seasonal trends and hybrid data-driven models under real-world traffic conditions. Renewable Energy, 249, 123193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123193
  45. Yong, Z., Shirong, H., Xiaohui, J., Mu, X., Yuntao, Y., & Xi, Y. (2023). Three-dimensional simulation of large-scale proton exchange membrane fuel cell considering the liquid water removal characteristics on the cathode side. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(27), 10160-10179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.343
  46. You, J., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Shi, W. (2026). Optimization of fuel cell heavy-duty commercial vehicles sizing and energy management based on an offline-online framework. Journal of Power Sources, 666, 239202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.239202
  47. Zamel, N., & Li, X. (2013). Effective transport properties for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells – With a focus on the gas diffusion layer. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 39(1), 111-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.07.002
  48. Zenyuk, I. V. (2021). The bridge from bio-inspired molecular catalysts to fuel cell electrocatalysts. Chem Catalysis, 1(1), 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2021.03.008
  49. Ziegler, C., Thiele, S., & Zengerle, R. (2011). Direct three-dimensional reconstruction of a nanoporous catalyst layer for a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 196(4), 2094-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.044
  50. Zuo, Q., Wang, G., Shen, Z., Zhu, X., Xie, Y., Li, Y., Ma, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Digital twinning of multi-physics field performance of faceted novel snake coil flow field proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 649, 237442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237442

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-04-15 16:51:45

No citation recorded.