DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62444
View PDF Download fulltext

Economic growth and renewable energy consumption in Asia: Does good governance moderate the trade-off?

School of Government (SOG), College of Economics, Law and Government (CELG), University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Viet Nam

Received: 2 Mar 2026; Revised: 17 Apr 2026; Accepted: 14 May 2026; Available online: 22 May 2026; Published: 1 Jul 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the trade-off between economic growth and renewable energy consumption in 31 Asian economies over the period 1996-2023, with a focus on the moderating role of governance quality. Using fixed-effects panel estimation, with country-clustered standard errors, we construct a multi-dimensional governance quality index based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The findings suggest that economic growth is associated with a statistically significant decline in the share of renewable energy consumption (β=-13.59, p<0.01). In semi-log terms, a 1% increase in GDP per capita is associated with a 0.136 percentage-point reduction in renewable energy consumption share, implying the presence of growth-induced fossil fuel dependence. However, the interaction term between growth and governance is positive and significant (β=1.73, p <0.05), indicating that stronger governance quality mitigates this adverse effect. Further analysis using an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) specification reveals a U-shaped relationship between income and renewable energy consumption. Sensitivity analysis using disaggregated governance indicators shows that government effectiveness and regulatory quality are the key institutional dimensions driving this moderating effect. Subsample analysis further uncovers significant heterogeneity across income groups. While the trade-off is prominent in lower-middle and upper-middle income economies, high-income countries exhibit a positive growth-renewable energy consumption nexus. The results remain robust when using lagged explanatory variables. This study contributes to the literature by providing cross-country evidence of a fossil lock-in effect in Asia and by identifying governance quality as a moderating institutional mechanism shaping the energy transition. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening institutional quality to align economic growth with renewable energy development in heterogeneous Asian contexts.

Keywords: SDG 7; SDG 13; Economic growth; Renewable energy consumption; Good governance; Moderating role; Asian economies, Fixed-effect panel estimation.
Funding: Vietnameses Ministry of Education and Training

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Economic growth and renewable energy consumption in Asia: Does good governance moderate the trade-off? Experimental investigation of a wildlife-safe origami-inspired reaction-type wind turbine for sustainable urban energy systems Impact of development and application of advanced technology on labor productivity and energy management efficiency in Vietnam More recent articles
Most cited articles
Batch and Fed-Batch Fermentation System on Ethanol Production from Whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus Combustion characteristics of diesel engine using producer gas and blends of Jatropha methyl ester with diesel in mixed fuel mode A novel single input double output (SIDO) converter for torque ripple minimization in solar powered BLDC motor Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Evidence from MINT Economies Cultivation of Chlorella sp. as Biofuel Sources in Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) More cited articles
  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  3. Asongu, S., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2022). Governance and renewable energy consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 16(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-10-2020-0009
  4. Aye, G. C., & Edoja, P. E. (2017). Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1379239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239
  5. Bakirtas, T., & Akpolat, A. G. (2018). The relationship between energy consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in new emerging-market countries. Energy, 147, 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.011
  6. Bamati, N., & Raoofi, A. (2020). Development level and the impact of technological factor on renewable energy production. Renewable Energy, 151, 946-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.098
  7. Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4, pp. 135-145). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
  8. Berrich, O., Mafakheri, F., & Dabbou, H. (2024). Renewable energy transition and the Paris agreement: how governance quality makes a difference? Energies, 17(17), 4238 https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174238
  9. Bertoldi, P. (2022). Policies for energy conservation and sufficiency: Review of existing policies and recommendations for new and effective policies in OECD countries. Energy and Buildings, 264, 112075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112075
  10. Blazquez, J., Fuentes, R., & Manzano, B. (2020). On some economic principles of the energy transition. Energy Policy, 147, 111807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111807
  11. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
  12. Doğan, B., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). European commitment to COP21 and the role of energy consumption, FDI, trade and economic complexity in sustaining economic growth. Journal of Environmental Management, 273, 111146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111146
  13. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  14. Eitan, A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2023). Locked in transition? Towards a conceptualization of path-dependence lock-ins in the renewable energy landscape. Energy Research & Social Science, 106, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103316
  15. Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2025). Population based on various sources (2024). https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fossil-fuels-per-capita?tab=line&time=earliest..2024&country=OWID_EUR~USA~AUS~OWID_ASI
  16. Evensen, D., & Sovacool, B. K. (2024). Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 114016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016
  17. Eyuboglu, K., & Uzar, U. (2025). The social, economic, and environmental drivers of renewable energy: Is income inequality a threat to renewable energy transition? Journal of Cleaner Production, 490, 144780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144780
  18. Gershon, O., Asafo, J. K., Sowah, J. N., & Tanko, F. (2025). Persistence of emissions in selected African countries: energy consumption and population growth dynamics. Energy Strategy Reviews, 57, 101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101628
  19. Goyal, N., Taeihagh, A., & Howlett, M. (2022). Mapping the use of public policy theories in energy transitions research: a bibliometric review and computational text analysis. Routledge Handbook of Energy Transitions, 332-349. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183020
  20. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  21. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics- 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies
  22. Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2021). Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions− an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 15485-15503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2
  23. Haines, A., Kovats, R. S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., & Corvalán, C. (2006). Climate change and human health: impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health, 120(7), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002
  24. Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson, New York.
  25. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1251-1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
  26. Heshmati, A., & Rashidghalam, M. (2020). Measurement and analysis of urban infrastructure and its effects on urbanization in China. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(1), 04019030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000513
  27. IMF (2025). Annual GDP growth,1980-2030. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/real-gdp growth?country=OWID_WRL~Middle+East+and+Central+Asia+%28IMF%29~ASEAN-5+%28IMF%29
  28. IPCC. (2022). Emissions Trends and Drivers. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.004
  29. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Rab, S., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Sensors for daily life: A review. Sensors International, 2, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100121
  30. Kabeyi, M. J. B., & Olanrewaju, O. A. (2022). Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy research, 9, 743114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
  31. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money (1936) (p. 149). Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing
  32. Li, R., Yang, Z., & Wang, Q. (2025). Does renewable energy reduce energy intensity? A matter of income inequality. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04439-1
  33. Liu, Y. (2009). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy, 34(11), 1846-1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.029
  34. Mahalik, M. K., Patel, G., Sahoo, B. K., & Rahman, M. M. (2023). Impact of income inequality on renewable energy demand in south Asian economies. Energy Policy, 180, 113628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113628
  35. Marques, A. C., Fuinhas, J. A., & Manso, J. P. (2010). Motivations driving renewable energy in European countries: A panel data approach. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6877-6885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.003
  36. Menegaki, A. N., & Ozturk, I. (2013). Growth and energy nexus in Europe revisited: Evidence from a fixed effects political economy model. Energy Policy, 61, 881-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.076
  37. Mentel, G., Lewandowska, A., Berniak-Woźny, J., & Tarczyński, W. (2023). Green and renewable energy innovations: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Energies, 16(3), 1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031428
  38. Mohamad, A. H. H., & Ab-Rahim, R. (2025). Mapping the research landscape of energy market and renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 14(4), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.61058
  39. Nepal, R., & Paija, N. (2019). Energy security, electricity, population and economic growth: The case of a developing South Asian resource-rich economy. Energy Policy, 132, 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.054
  40. Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T., & Pham, A. T. Q. (2025). Moderating Role of Governance in the Nexus of Economic Growth and Renewable Energy Consumption: The Case of Southeast Asian Countries. In Green Economic Development and Transition to Low-Carbon Economy in the East and Southeast Asia (pp. 165-188). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0628-3_10
  41. Njoh, A. J. (2021). Renewable energy as a determinant of inter-country differentials in CO2 emissions in Africa. Renewable Energy, 172, 1225-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.096
  42. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  43. Overland, I., Juraev, J., & Vakulchuk, R. (2022). Are renewable energy sources more evenly distributed than fossil fuels? Renewable Energy, 200, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.046
  44. Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
  45. Radtke, J. (2025). Understanding the complexity of governing energy transitions: introducing an integrated approach of policy and transition perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 35(4), 595-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2158
  46. Rahman, M. M., & Sultana, N. (2022). Impacts of institutional quality, economic growth, and exports on renewable energy: Emerging countries perspective. Renewable Energy, 189, 938-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.034
  47. Salahuddin, M., Ali, M. I., Vink, N., & Gow, J. (2019). The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3), 2699-2709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3790-4
  48. Salim, R. A., & Shafiei, S. (2014). Urbanization and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: An empirical analysis. Economic Modelling, 38, 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.008
  49. Sarkodie, S. A., Adams, S., & Leirvik, T. (2020). Foreign direct investment and renewable energy in climate change mitigation: does governance matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121262
  50. Shahbaz, M., Wang, J., Dong, K., & Zhao, J. (2022). The impact of digital economy on energy transition across the globe: The mediating role of government governance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112620
  51. Shao, H., Wang, Y., Lee, C. C., & Wen, H. (2024). How does political stability affect renewable energy finance? International evidence. Energy, 313, 133829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133829
  52. Shukla, A. K., Sudhakar, K., & Baredar, P. (2017). Renewable energy resources in South Asian countries: Challenges, policy and recommendations. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(3), 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.12.003
  53. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  54. Uzar, U. (2020). Political economy of renewable energy: does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? Renewable Energy, 155, 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172
  55. Wang, E., Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M. K., Patel, G., & Hu, G. (2022). Effects of institutional quality and political risk on the renewable energy consumption in the OECD countries. Resources Policy, 79, 103041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103041
  56. Wise, J. (2021). COP26: fifty countries commit to climate resilient and low carbon health systems. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2734
  57. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross section and Panel Data. MIT press
  58. Yıldırım, B., Kasman, S., & Kasman, A. (2025). Spatial convergence of renewable energy consumption in the EU: Assessing the role of environmental policies and regional dynamics. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06967-x
  59. Zeng, C., Stringer, L. C., & Lv, T. (2021). The spatial spillover effect of fossil fuel energy trade on CO2 emissions. Energy, 223, 120038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120038

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-05-24 14:24:59

No citation recorded.