DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.60982

Numerical simulation of co-firing oil palm fronds and lignite coal injected at different burning rates in tangential pulverized coal burner

1Mechanical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Indonesia

2Mechanical Engineering, University Islamic-Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad-Al Banjari, Indonesia

Received: 27 Dec 2024; Revised: 6 Mar 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025; Available online: 30 Apr 2025; Published: 1 May 2025.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Reducing CO₂ emissions and utilizing biomass, particularly palm oil mill waste, is crucial for addressing climate change, enhancing air quality, and advancing environmentally sustainable clean technology innovations. Palm fronds can serve as a renewable fuel source with minimal emissions, providing a viable co-firing option for coal in coal-fired power plants (PLTU). Although previous studies have shown promising CO₂ emission reductions through co-combustion of oil palm fronds and coal, there is still no comprehensive analysis of the combustion characteristics and emission behavior when varying the burner injection zone, thus further research is required. This study performs a numerical analysis using three-dimensional computational-fluid dynamics (CFD) to examine the co-burning process of palm fronds alongside low-calorie coal (LRC) at the Pacitan PLTU, which has a capacity of 315 megawatts. The co-burning simulation, incorporating a 5% substitution of palm fronds in each burner, was conducted to differentiate between burners A and D, aiming to determine the optimum injection area. The findings of the simulation reveal inconsistencies in combustion properties, particularly regarding temperature allocation. The primary results demonstrate a temperature rise when palm fronds are used as a co-firing fuel, attributed to their greater volatility and oxygen content compared to coal. The most notable decrease in CO₂ emissions was observed with the substitution of 5% oil palm fronds in burner B; however, the reduction was not substantial, as indicated by a mass fraction value of 0.128 at the boiler discharge. An increase in NOx mass fraction was also observed due to the organic nitrogen in palm frond biomass, which decomposes rapidly during combustion at high temperatures. This co-firing technology is expected to provide a means for lowering emissions and improving the use of alternative fuels as a substitution for fossil fuels in a time to come.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Boiler; Computational fluid dynamics; Co-firing; Oil palm fronds; LRC

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Multi-temporal forecasting of wind energy production using artificial intelligence models Development of WO3/TiO2-NT/Ti photoanode for simultaneously POME degradation, electricity generation, and hydrogen production in a photocatalysis-fuel cell system An electro-thermal modeling of distribution transformer for hottest spot evaluation under photovoltaic-induced harmonics More recent articles
Most cited articles
Evaluation of Physico-Mechanical-Combustion Characteristics of Fuel Briquettes made from blends of Areca Nut Husk, Simarouba Seed Shell and Black Liquor Experimental Study on the Production of Karanja Oil Methyl Ester and Its Effect on Diesel Engine Effects of turbulence models and grid densities on computational accuracy of flows over a vertical axis wind turbine Performance evaluation of common rail direct injection (CRDI) engine fuelled with Uppage Oil Methyl Ester (UOME) Combustion characteristics of diesel engine using producer gas and blends of Jatropha methyl ester with diesel in mixed fuel mode More cited articles
  1. Adi Saputra, I. N. A., Manurung, T. D., Yuliadi, A. E., Prabowo, Nugroho, G., Kusumadewi, T. V., Hariana, H., & Chan, S. H. (2024). Numerical simulation of co-firing LRC and ammonia in Pangkalan Susu 3 & 4 coal-fired steam power plant (CFSPP) capacity 210 megawatts. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105230
  2. Agus Adi Saputra, I. N., Prabowo, Setiyawan, A., Bagus Wijaya Kusuma, I. G., Ihsan, S., & Darmawan, A. (2024). Numerical Simulation Co-Firing Of EFB And LRC Injected At Different Burner Levels In Tangential Combustion-Type Pulverized Boilers. 2024 10th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communication, ICSCC 2024, 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCC62041.2024.10690373
  3. Agus Adi Saputra, I. N., Prabowo, Setiyawan, A., Bagus Wijaya Kusuma, I. G., Ihsan, S., & Hariana. (2023). 3D Simulation Combustion Characteristics Of EFB Biomass Co-Firing With Low Rank Coal In Pulverized Coal Boiler. 2023 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation, ICAMIMIA 2023 - Proceedings, 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMIMIA60881.2023.10427894
  4. Aprianti, N., Kismanto, A., Supriatna, N. K., Yarsono, S., Nainggolan, L. M. T., Purawiardi, R. I., Fariza, O., Ermada, F. J., Zuldian, P., Raksodewanto, A. A., & Alamsyah, R. (2023). Prospect and challenges of producing carbon black from oil palm biomass: A review. In Bioresource Technology Reports (Vol. 23). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101587
  5. Arifin, Z., Insani, V. F. S., Idris, M., Hadiyati, K. R., Anugia, Z., & Irianto, D. (2023). Techno-Economic Analysis of Co-Firing for Pulverized Coal Boilers Power Plant in Indonesia. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.48102
  6. Aziz, M., Budianto, D., & Oda, T. (2016). Computational fluid dynamic analysis of co-firing of palm kernel shell and coal. Energies, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030137
  7. Aziz, M., Oda, T., & Kashiwagi, T. (2015). Innovative Steam Drying of Empty Fruit Bunch with High Energy Efficiency. Drying Technology, 33(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.970257
  8. Aziz, M., Prawisudha, P., Prabowo, B., & Budiman, B. A. (2015). Integration of energy-efficient empty fruit bunch drying with gasification/combined cycle systems. Applied Energy, 139, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.038
  9. Bhuiyan, A. A., Karim, M. R., & Naser, J. (2016a). Modeling of Solid and Bio-Fuel Combustion Technologies. In Thermofluid Modeling for Energy Efficiency Applications (pp. 259–309). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802397-6.00016-6
  10. Bhuiyan, A. A., Karim, M. R., & Naser, J. (2016b). Modeling of Solid and Bio-Fuel Combustion Technologies. In Thermofluid Modeling for Energy Efficiency Applications (pp. 259–309). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802397-6.00016-6
  11. Bhuiyan, A. A., & Naser, J. (2015). Computational modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel condition in a small scale furnace. Fuel, 143, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.089
  12. Cahyo, N., Sulistiyowati, D., Rahmanta, M. A., Felani, M. I., Soleh, M., Paryanto, P., Prismantoko, A., & Hariana, H. (2024). A techno-economic and environmental analysis of co-firing implementation using coal and wood bark blend at circulating fluidized bed boiler. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 13(4), 726–735. https://doi.org/10.61435/IJRED.2024.60234
  13. Chae, T., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Yang, W., & Ryu, C. (2021). Pilot-scale experimental study on impacts of biomass cofiring methods to nox emission from pulverized coal boilers—part 2: Nox reduction capability through reburning versus cofiring. Energies, 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206552
  14. Chiaramonti, D., Prussi, M., Buffi, M., Rizzo, A. M., & Pari, L. (2017). Review and experimental study on pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae for biofuel production. Applied Energy, 185, 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.001
  15. Darmawan, A., Budianto, D., Aziz, M., & Tokimatsu, K. (2017). Retrofitting existing coal power plants through cofiring with hydrothermally treated empty fruit bunch and a novel integrated system. Applied Energy, 204, 1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.122
  16. Demirbas, A. (2005). Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 31(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.02.002
  17. Du, Y., Wang, C., Lv, Q., Li, D., Liu, H., & Che, D. (2017). CFD investigation on combustion and NOx emission characteristics in a 600 MW wall-fired boiler under high temperature and strong reducing atmosphere. Applied Thermal Engineering, 126, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.147
  18. Garcia-Nunez, J. A., Ramirez-Contreras, N. E., Rodriguez, D. T., Silva-Lora, E., Frear, C. S., Stockle, C., & Garcia-Perez, M. (2016). Evolution of palm oil mills into bio-refineries: Literature review on current and potential uses of residual biomass and effluents. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 110(99–114). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.022
  19. Ghosh, A., Brown, J. L., Smith, R. G., & Brown, R. C. (2023). Hydrolysis of anhydrosugars derived from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for integration in a biorefinery. Sustainable Energy and Fuels, 7(14), 3361–3374. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3se00240c
  20. Hariana, H., Putra, H. P., Prabowo, Hilmawan, E., Darmawan, A., Mochida, K., & Aziz, M. (2023a). Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Ash-Related Problems During Coal Co-Firing With Different Types of Biomass in a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler. Energy, 269, 126784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126784
  21. Hariana, H., Putra, H. P., Prabowo, Hilmawan, E., Darmawan, A., Mochida, K., & Aziz, M. (2023b). Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Ash-Related Problems During Coal Co-Firing With Different Types of Biomass in a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler. Energy, 269, 126784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126784
  22. Ibbett, R., Gaddipati, S., Davies, S., Hill, S., & Tucker, G. (2011). The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: New insights from thermal-analytical and complementary studies. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 9272–9278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.044
  23. Ihsan, S., Prabowo, Widodo, W. A., & Adi Saputra, I. N. A. (2023). Numerical Investigation Effect of the addition of palm fronds on the burning of coal-fired boilers tangentially. 2023 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation, ICAMIMIA 2023 - Proceedings, 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMIMIA60881.2023.10427970
  24. Ihsan, S., Prabowo, Widodo, W. A., Saputra, I. N. A. A., & Hariana. (2024). Utilization of Palm Frond Waste as Fuel for Co-Firing Coal and Biomass in a Tangentially Pulverized Coal Boiler Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis. Biomass, 4(4), 1142–1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4040063
  25. Jamari, S. S., & Howse, J. R. (2012). The effect of the hydrothermal carbonization process on palm oil empty fruit bunch. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.061
  26. Jiang, Y., Park, K. H., & Jeon, C. H. (2020). Feasibility study of co-firing of torrefied empty fruit bunch and coal through boiler simulation. Energies, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123051
  27. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Park, J. C. (2009). Application of recycled paper sludge and biomass materials in manufacture of green composite pallet. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(12), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.021
  28. Kumar, K., Tyagi, U., Sirohi, S., Kumar, R., Kumar Maity, S., Nikita, Singh, S., & Kumar, G. (2025). A critical review on nanostructure-doped carbonized biomass: A new Era in sustainable supercapacitor technology. In Fuel (Vol. 381). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133707
  29. Lam, P. S., Lam, P. Y., Sokhansanj, S., Lim, C. J., Bi, X. T., Stephen, J. D., Pribowo, A., & Mabee, W. E. (2015). Steam explosion of oil palm residues for the production of durable pellets. Applied Energy, 141, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.029
  30. Li, W., Guo, J., Cheng, H., Wang, W., & Dong, R. (2017). Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation. Applied Energy, 189, 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.101
  31. Liu, Z., Quek, A., Kent Hoekman, S., & Balasubramanian, R. (2013). Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel, 103, 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069
  32. Lucian, M., & Fiori, L. (2017). Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass: Process design, modeling, energy efficiency and cost analysis. Energies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020211
  33. Putra, H. P., Kuswa, F. M., Prabowo, & Hariana, H. (2023). Utilization of Calliandra Calothyrsus and Gliricidia Sepium as Co-Firing Fuel With Consideration of Ash-Related Issues. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1281(1), 12014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1281/1/012014
  34. Rahman, M. N., Yusup, S., Chin, B. L. F., Shariff, I., & Quitain, A. T. (2023). Oil Palm Wastes Co-Firing in an Opposed Firing 500 MW Utility Boiler: A Numerical Analysis. CFD Letters, 15(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.15.3.139152
  35. Román, S., Nabais, J. M. V., Laginhas, C., Ledesma, B., & González, J. F. (2012). Hydrothermal carbonization as an effective way of densifying the energy content of biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 103, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.11.009
  36. Su, X., Chen, X., Fang, Q., Ma, L., Tan, P., Zhang, C., Chen, G., & Yin, C. (2024). An integrated model for flexible simulation of biomass combustion in a travelling grate-fired boiler. Energy, 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132605
  37. Tabet, F., & Gökalp, I. (2015). Review on CFD based models for co-firing coal and biomass. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 51, pp. 1101–1114). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.045
  38. Tirumareddy, P., Patra, B. R., Borugadda, V. B., & Dalai, A. K. (2024). Co-hydrothermal liquefaction of waste biomass: Comparison of various feedstocks and process optimization. Bioresource Technology Reports, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101898
  39. Torres Ramos, R., Valdez Salas, B., Montero Alpírez, G., Coronado Ortega, M. A., Curiel Álvarez, M. A., Tzintzun Camacho, O., & Beleño Cabarcas, M. T. (2023). Torrefaction under Different Reaction Atmospheres to Improve the Fuel Properties of Wheat Straw. Processes, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071971
  40. Usino, D. O., Sar, T., Ylitervo, P., & Richards, T. (2023). Effect of Acid Pretreatment on the Primary Products of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis. Energies, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052377
  41. Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2013). An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash. Part 1. Phase-mineral and chemical composition and classification. Fuel, 105, 40–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.041
  42. Wang, Y., & Yan, L. (2008). CFD studies on biomass thermochemical conversion. International Journal of Molecular Sciences ,9(6), 1108–1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9061108
  43. Wang, Z., Yu, D., Han, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Impacts of Torrefaction on PM10 Emissions from Biomass Combustion. Energy Engineering, 118(5), 1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2021.016107
  44. Werther, J., Saenger, M., Hartge, E. U., Ogada, T., & Siagi, Z. (2000). Combustion of agricultural residues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00005-2
  45. Westbrook, C. K., & Dryer, F. L. (1981). Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 27(1–2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946970
  46. Wongsiriwittaya, M., Chompookham, T., & Bubphachot, B. (2023). Improvement of Higher Heating Value and Hygroscopicity Reduction of Torrefied Rice Husk by Torrefaction and Circulating Gas in the System. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411193
  47. Yin, C., Rosendahl, L., Kær, S. K., & Condra, T. J. (2004). Use of numerical modeling in design for co-firing biomass in wall-fired burners. Chemical Engineering Science, 59(16), 3281–3292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.036
  48. Yu, Y., Xu, L., Zhu, G., Liu, Y., & Niu, Y. (2023). Synergistical reduction of PM and NO formation in preheating co-firing of coal and biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138918

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-05-25 01:22:39

No citation recorded.