DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.61011

Comparative life cycle assessment of pelletized biomass fuels from corncobs and rubberwood sawdust

1Program in Biology, Faculty of Education, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand

2Laboratory of Advanced Combustion Technology and Energy Systems (LACTES), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand

Received: 5 Jan 2025; Revised: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 18 May 2025; Available online: 28 May 2025; Published: 1 Jul 2025.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study investigates and compares the environmental impacts of pelletized biomass fuel production from corn cobs and rubberwood sawdust using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology across the entire cradle-to-grave process. The assessment encompasses raw material acquisition, production, industrial use, and transportation. Data were collected on resource usage, energy consumption, water usage, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with the functional unit set as 1 ton of steam generated by a steam generator. Environmental impacts were evaluated using the CML (baseline) 2015 method in openLCA software, with data drawn from the Ecoinvent 3.4 database. Comparisons with other biomass types were also included. The findings indicate that corn cobs are a preferable raw material for pelletized biomass production compared to rubberwood sawdust, as they require less electricity and fewer resources across the lifecycle due to a simpler production process. The study reveals that the highest environmental impacts occur during biomass pellet production, particularly in rubberwood processing, which is energy intensive. Climate change impacts are most significant in the steam production stage, attributed to GHG emissions from biomass pellet combustion. Furthermore, fossil fuels used in other processes and transportation contribute to the overall environmental footprint. Mitigating these impacts would benefit from enhancing energy efficiency, reducing GHG emissions, and expanding the use of renewable energy in production processes. These measures could substantially lessen the environmental effects associated with pelletized biomass fuel production. The impact of data uncertainties in steam production from biomass pellets was assessed through sensitivity analysis. Four key parameters were identified as having significant variability, including transportation of pellets from production plants to steam plants, corn kernel selling price, natural rubber selling price, and allocation method. The transportation distance and agricultural product prices (corn kernel and natural rubber) introduce minimal uncertainty into the LCA results within the tested range (±10%).

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Life Cycle Assessment; Pelletized Biomass Fuel; Corn Cobs, Rubberwood Sawdust
Funding: Fundamental Fund (FF2567), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), Thailand,

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Parametric and characteristic evaluation of microwave-assisted pyrolysis for the generation of biochar from Dodonaea viscosa branches Influence of profile geometry on the self-starting capability of an H-Darrieus turbine A bilevel zonal dispatch strategy considering electric vehicle users' demand response Mapping the research landscape of energy market and renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis A scoping review of numerical modelling studies of geothermal reservoirs: Trends and opportunities post-COP25 More recent articles
Most cited articles
Analytical Investigations of Kinetic and Heat Transfer in Slow Pyrolysis of a Biomass Particle Thermal Energy Optimization of Building Integrated Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Thermal Systems Effect of hydrothermal treatment temperature on the properties of sewage sludge derived solid fuel Numerical Performance Analyses of Different Airfoils for Use in Wind Turbines Characterization and Performance Test of Palm Oil Based Bio-Fuel Produced Via Ni/Zeolite-Catalyzed Cracking Process More cited articles
  1. Absolute Clean Energy (ACE). (2024a). Biomass fuel prices for May 24-31, 2024. Retrieved June 23, 2024, from https://www.ace-energy.co.th/th/
  2. Absolute Clean Energy (ACE). (2024b). Biomass fuel prices for January 12-18, 2024. Retrieved June 23, 2024, from https://www.ace-energy.co.th/th/
  3. Adams, P. W. R., Shirley, J. E. J., & McManus, M. C. (2015). Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction. Applied Energy, 138, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.002
  4. Arromdee, P., & Kuprianov, V. I. (2019). Experimental study and empirical modeling of CO and NO behaviors in a fluidized-bed combustor firing pelletized biomass fuels. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00542-x
  5. Buasan, P., Sajjakulnukit, B., Bowonthumrongchai, T., & Gheewala, S. H. (2025). Integrated open Leontief model for analysis of biomass pellet demand in Thailand. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 14(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.60691
  6. Brás, I., Fabbricino, M., Ferreira, J., Silva, E., & Mignano, V. (2025). Sustainable Heat Production for Fossil Fuel Replacement—Life Cycle Assessment for Plant Biomass Renewable Energy Sources. Sustainability, 17(7), 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073109
  7. De la Fuente, T., Erber, G., & Bergström, D. (2018). Life cycle assessment of decentralized mobile production systems for pelletizing logging residues under Nordic conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.030
  8. Department of Land Transport (DLT). (2017). Transport statistics report in 2017. Bangkok: Department of Land Transport (Thailand)
  9. Dunn, J. B., Mueller, S., Kwon, H. Y., & Wang, M. Q. (2013). Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol Biofuels, 6, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-51
  10. Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO). (2024). Energy statistics. Bangkok: Energy Policy and Planning Office. Retrieved August 1, 2024, from https://www.eppo.go.th/epposite/index.php/en/component/k2/item/20369-news-180367
  11. García, R., Pizarro, C., Lavín, A. G., & Bueno, J. L. (2018). Pelletization properties of raw and torrefied pine sawdust with various parameters. Fuel, 215, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.027
  12. Goree, J., Curran, M. A., & Hensler, C. (2002). Life cycle assessment operational guides to ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  13. Guddaraddi, R., Babu, A., & Patil, K. (2023). Sustainable biofuel production from agricultural residues: A review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 2905–2914. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102956
  14. Hassan, M., Usman, N., Hussain, M., Yousaf, A., Khattak, M. A., Yousaf, S., Mishr, R. S., Ahmad, S., Rehman, F., & Rashedi, A. (2023). Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pellets Biofuel in Hazara Division, Pakistan. Sustainability, 15(15), 12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512089
  15. Hengpanit Co., Ltd. (2024). Rubberwood 1 1/2″ x 3″ x 2.50 m. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://hengpanit.com/17413561/ไม้ยาง-1-12-x-3-x-250-ม
  16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and frameworks. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  17. Jiang, Y., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2020). Life cycle assessment of straw pellet production in China. Renewable Energy, 155, 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.0433
  18. Katinntakul, W. (2022). Biomass pellet fuel from natural energy. Sarasara, Journal of the Department of Science Service
  19. Khumhem, P., Thaweethanasit, T., & Phornprapha, T. (2017). Thermal efficiency analysis of biomass stoves using corncob fuel. the 24th Tri-University International Joint Seminar and Symposium 2017 Mie University, Japan, October 23 – October 27, 2017
  20. Kizuka, T., Yoshida, Y., & Inoue, K. (2019). Characteristics of wood pellets mixed with torrefied rice straw as biomass fuel. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 10, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-0305-0
  21. Laschi, A., González-García, S., & Casas-Ledón, Y. (2016). Environmental performance evaluation of wood pellet production through life cycle analysis. Energy, 97, 469–480. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.165
  22. Luanmanee, S., & Paisancharoen, K. (2011). Nitrogen balance in upland fields of Thailand. Food & Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletin, No. 642
  23. Muazu, R. I., Mohammed, I. A., & Bugaje, I. M. (2017). Life cycle assessment of biomass densification systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 107, 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.026
  24. Nasrin, A. B., Omar, R., & Khalid, N. H. (2017). Quality compliance and environmental impact of EFB pellet fuel in Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 29(4), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2017.0002
  25. Nunes, L. J. R., Matias, J. C. O., & Catalão, J. P. S. (2019). Evaluation of the utilization of woodchips as fuel for industrial boilers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.165
  26. Petlickaitė, R., Jasinskas, A., Venslauskas, K., Navickas, K., Praspaliauskas, M., & Lemanas, E. (2024). Evaluation of multi-crop biofuel pellet properties and the life cycle assessment. Agriculture, 14(7), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071162
  27. Phomsoda, S. (2008). Life cycle inventory development for parawood saw timber toward sustainable environmental management. Master’s Thesis, Thammasat University, Thailand
  28. Phungrassami, H., & Usubharatana, P. (2015). Life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency of para-rubber wood production in Thailand. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(5), 2113–2126. https://www.pjoes.com/Life-Cycle-Assessment-and-Eco-Efficiency-r-nof-Para-Rubber-Wood-Production-in-Thailand,89483,0,2.html
  29. Ratnasingam, J., Ioras, F., & Senin, A. (2017). Carbon footprint calculation of rubberwood sawmilling in Peninsular Malaysia. BioResources, 12(2), 3490–3503
  30. Rashedi, M., Rosales, M., & Solano, P. (2022). Environmental sustainability assessment of biomass pellet biofuel from agroforest residues. Regional Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/regional-sustainability
  31. Reed, D., Chiu, L. H., & Bergman, R. (2012). Cradle-to-gate life-cycle inventory and impact assessment of wood fuel pellet manufacturing. Forest Products Journal, 62(4), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-12-00015.1
  32. Sgarbossa, A., Russo, M. A., & De Bari, I. (2020). Sustainability evaluation of wood pellet production in Italy. Forests, 11(11), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111127
  33. Supasri, W., Sukanya, P., & Chaiyapat, K. (2020). Life cycle GHGs and PM10 evaluation of maize cultivation in Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment, 8, 5-8
  34. Svensson, M., Hansson, P.-A., & Jönsson, M. (2024). Valorisation of agricultural residues into pellets in a circular bioeconomy. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 19(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5808
  35. Thai Maize and Seed Traders Association. (2024). Agricultural product prices June 12, 2024. Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://www.thaimaizeandproduce.org/
  36. Thai Rubber Association. (2024a). Prices of rubber latex and cup lump as of July 15, 2024. Retrieved July 15, 2024, from https://www.thainr.com/th/?selectMonth=07&selectY=2024&detail=pr-local
  37. Thai Rubberwood Business Association. (2024b). Announcement of the average price of dried rubberwood as of February 3, 2024
  38. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2009). North America’s wood pellet sector. FPL-RP-656. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin
  39. Williams E, Eikenaar S. Finding your way in multifunctional processes and recycling [Internet]. 2022. Available from https://presustainability.com/articles/finding-your-way-in-allocation-methods-multifunctional-processes-recycling/
  40. Wahyono, Y., Hadiyanto, H., Gheewala, S.H., Budihardjo, M.A., Adiansyah, J.S. (2022). Evaluating the environmental impacts of the multi-feedstock biodiesel production process in Indonesia using life cycle assessment (LCA). Energy Conversion and Management, 266, 115832 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115832
  41. Zheng, Y., Liu, C., Zhu, J., Sang, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, W., & Zhuang, M. (2022). Carbon footprint analysis for biomass-fueled combined heat and power station: A case study. Agriculture, 12(8), 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081146
  42. Żelazna, A., Kraszkiewicz, A., Przywara, A., Łagód, G., Bajcar, M., Kachel-Jakubowska, M., & Zawiślak, K. (2019). Life cycle assessment of production of black locust logs and straw pellets for energy purposes. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(1), e13043. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13043
  43. Zlateva, P., Yordanov, K., Murzova, M., & Terziev, A. (2025). Consumer preferences for solid biomass fuels for energy purposes. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 14(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.60473

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-11 06:01:49

No citation recorded.