DOI: https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2026.62204
View PDF Download fulltext

Integrated upgrading of waste cooking oil–derived biodiesel via reaction pathway selection, adsorption, and feedstock blending

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, 50 NgamWongWan Road, Jatujak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

2Research Centre for Biomass Valorization, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok, 16424, Indonesia

3Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok, 16424, Indonesia

Received: 10 Dec 2025; Revised: 15 Jan 2026; Accepted: 9 Feb 2026; Available online: 15 Feb 2026; Published: 1 Mar 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil (WCO) offers environmental and economic advantages but is constrained by degraded feedstock quality and unstable fuel properties. This study evaluates an integrated upgrading strategy combining reaction pathway selection, adsorption-based purification, and feedstock blending to produce fuel-grade biodiesel. WCO was pretreated by moisture removal and acid esterification using H₂SO₄ to reduce free fatty acids. Transesterification was conducted in a temperature-controlled batch reactor at 60 °C using 6:1–12:1 methanol-to-oil mass ratios, 1.0–2.0 wt% KOH catalyst loadings, and 60–120 minute reaction times. The maximum FAME content achieved was 93.94 wt% at 6:1 methanol ratio, 1.5 wt% KOH, and 90 min reaction time. Post-reaction upgrading was performed via batch adsorption using activated carbon (0.5–2 wt%, 60 °C) and silica gel (3 wt%, 112 °C). Adsorption improved FAME content to 94–95 wt% (maximum 95.3 wt% with silica gel) and reduced acid value and carbon residue. However, oxidation stability decreased slightly after adsorption (from 4.20 to 4.05 h), indicating partial removal of natural antioxidants. GC–MS analysis confirmed the dominance of methyl esters and the reduction of minor impurity-related peaks after purification. To comply with multi-parameter fuel requirements, WCO was blended with palm olein prior to conversion at ratios of 100:0 to 10:90 (w/w). Full EN 14214 compliance (FAME ≥ 96.5 wt%) was achieved at ≥50% palm olein, with oxidation stability of 10.2 h at a 10:90 ratio. These findings demonstrate that adsorption enhances compositional purity, whereas feedstock blending is decisive for restoring oxidative stability and achieving robust, fuel-grade biodiesel.

Keywords: Adsorption-based purification; Esterification–transesterification; FAME; Fuel-grade biodiesel; Process integration
Funding: CLMV Research Fellowship from Kasetsart University, Thailand; Universitas Indonesia under contract PKS-3673/UN2.F4.D/PPM/00.00/2025.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Investigation of a PCM-based latent heat storage system combined with an adiabatic compressed air energy storage system in a renewable energy context Enhancing hierarchical factor (HF) and catalytic performance of Bayah’s natural zeolite catalyst for hydrocracking of palm oil to biofuels Design and optimization of an energy storage system for off-grid rural communities More recent articles
Most cited articles
Numerical Performance Analyses of Different Airfoils for Use in Wind Turbines A New Method for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) Blade Optimization Premixed combustion of coconut oil in a hele-shaw cell Variations of wave energy power in shoaling zone of Benin coastal zone Influence of the Determination Methods of K and C Parameters on the Ability of Weibull Distribution to Suitably Estimate Wind Potential and Electric Energy More cited articles
  1. Abed, K.M., Hayyan, A., Hizaddin, H.F., Hashim, M.A., Basirun, W.J., Saleh, J., and Hashim, N.A. (2025). Superiority of liquid membrane-based purification techniques in biodiesel downstream processing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 207(September 2024), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114911
  2. Atadashi, I.M., Aroua, M.K., and Aziz, A.A. (2010). High quality biodiesel and its diesel engine application: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(7), 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.020
  3. Awogbemi, O., & Desai, D. A. (2025). Recent advances in purification technologies for biodiesel-derived crude glycerol. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 46(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2025.2533373
  4. Bansod, P., Kodape, S., Dharaskar, S., and Shirsath, S. R. (2021). Review on membrane technology for separation of biodiesel. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 2415–2419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.482
  5. Busanello, F.W., Gomes, M.C.S., Paschoal, S.M., Baumgärtner, T.R. da S., Barp, G., and Fiorentin-Ferrari, L.D. (2024). The influence of membrane separation technique in the biodiesel and bioethanol production process: a review. Biofuels, 15(7), 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2023.2294593
  6. Çamur, H. and Al-Ani A.M.R. (2022). Prediction of Oxidation Stability of Biodiesel Derived from Waste and Refined Vegetable Oils by Statistical Approaches. Energies, 407(15), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020407
  7. Chupka, G. M., Fouts, L., Lennon, J. A., Alleman, T. L., Daniels, D. A., & McCormick, R. L. (2014). Saturated monoglyceride effects on low-temperature performance of biodiesel blends. Fuel Processing Technology, 118, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.10.002
  8. Degife, W., Ashenafi, M., Thiyagarajan, R., and Sahu, O. (2015). Extracted Biodiesel as Feed for Internal Combustion Engine. Science & Education Publishing, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.12691/jmdv-3-1-1
  9. Elias, S., Rabiu, A. M., Okeleye, B. I., Okudoh, V., and Oyekola, O. (2020). Bifunctional heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production from waste vegetable oil. Applied Sciences, 10(9), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093153
  10. Ferrusca, M.C., Romero, R., Martínez, S. L., Ramírez-Serrano, A., and Natividad, R. (2023). Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: A Perspective on Catalytic Processes. Processes, 11(7), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071952
  11. Ghaizani, M.A., Abdurrosyid, I., Paryanto, I., and Gozan, M. (2018). Monostearin effects on the formation of precipitate in palm oil biodiesel and petroleum diesel blends with various storage temperature. E3S Web of Conferences, 52, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200026
  12. Gozan, M., Paryanto, I., Darmawan, M.A., Sahlan, M., Hermansyah, H., Rismana, E., Arbianto, A. D., Prakoso, T., Aroua, M. K., and Cognet, P. (2022). Prediction of B20 Storage Tank Precipitate Removal Based on Biodiesel Monoglyceride Content. ChemEngineering, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6010007
  13. Hadiyanto, H., Aini, A. P., Widayat, W., Kusmiyati, K., Budiman, A., & Roesyadi, A. (2020). Multi-Feedstocks Biodiesel Production from Esterification of Calophyllum inophyllum Oil, Castor Oil, Palm Oil and Waste Cooking Oil. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.9.1.119-123
  14. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Kumar, D., Singh, B., Shahbeik, H., Lam, S., Aghbashlo, M., and Tabatabaei, M. (2022). Biodiesel antioxidants and their impact on the behavior of diesel engines: A comprehensive review. Fuel Processing Technology, 232, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107264
  15. Knothe, G. (2005). Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on the structure of fatty acid alkyl esters. Fuel Processing Technology, 86(10), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.002
  16. Knothe, G., and Razon, L. (2017). Biodiesel fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 58, 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.08.001
  17. Kumar, S., Singhal, M.K., and Sharma, M.P. (2023). Analysis of oil mixing for improvement of biodiesel quality with the application of mixture design method. Renewable Energy, 202, 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.097
  18. Kpan, J., and Krahl, J. (2019). The impact of adsorbents on the oxidative stability of biodiesel and its influence on the deterioration of engine oil. Fuel, 256, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115984
  19. Leung, D., Wu, X., and Leung, M. K.H. (2009). A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Applied Energy, 87, pp. 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006
  20. Lopresto, C.G., Gentile, M., Caravella, A., Candamano, S., and Calabrò, V. (2025a). De-acidification of waste cooking oils by adsorption on industrial waste: Kinetic analysis of a green pretreatment for biodiesel production. Chemosphere, 380, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144460
  21. Lopresto, C.G. (2025b). Sustainable biodiesel production from waste cooking oils for energetically independent small communities: an overview. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(3), 1953–1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05779-2
  22. Mansur, D., Fitriady, M.A., Setiapraja, H., Paryanto, I. and Gozan, M. (2019). Precipitation study of B30 blended from FAME and/or HVO and petro diesel fuel. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-2190. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-2190
  23. Mulyatun, M., Prameswari, J., Istadi, I., and Widayat, W. (2021). Production of non-food feedstock based biodiesel using acid-base bifunctional heterogeneous catalysts: A review. Fuel, 314, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122749
  24. Monika, Banga, S., and Pathak, V. V. (2023). Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A comprehensive review on the application of heterogenous catalysts. Energy Nexus, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100209
  25. Myint, N.N., Thanapimmetha, A., Saisriyoot, M., Chiarasumran, N., Srinophakun, T.R., Gozan, M., and Srinophakun, P. (2023). Process simulation and economic feasibility of biodiesel production from acid oil, a by-product of glycerol acidulation. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 57(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2023.57.1.16
  26. Osman, W.N.A.W., Rosli, M. H., Mazli, W. N. A., and Samsuri, S. (2024). Comparative review of biodiesel production and purification. Carbon Capture Science and Technology, 13(June), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100264
  27. Paryanto, I., Prakoso, T., Susanto, B. H., & Gozan, M. (2019). The effect of outdoor temperature conditions and monoglyceride content on the precipitate formation of biodiesel-petrodiesel blended fuel (Bxx). Evergreen, 6(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.5109/2321010
  28. Paryanto, I., Rismana, E., Arbianto, A. D., Prakoso, T., & Gozan, M. (2020). The Effect of Fuel Filter Pore Size on B20 Fuel Filter Clogging at Low-Temperature Condition. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 520(1), 0–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/520/1/012002
  29. Pradana, Y. S., Makertihartha, I. G. B. N., Indarto, A., Prakoso, T., & Soerawidjaja, T. H. (2024). A Review of Biodiesel Cold Flow Properties and Its Improvement Methods: Towards Sustainable Biodiesel Application. Energies, 17(18), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184543
  30. Rahadianti, E. S., Yerizam, & Martha. (2019). Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Green Processing and Synthesis, 8(1), . 828–836. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2019-0053
  31. Sales, M. B., Borges, P. T., Ribeiro Filho, M. N., Miranda da Silva, L. R., Castro, A. P., Sanders Lopes, A. A., Chaves de Lima, R. K., de Sousa Rios, M. A., and Santos, J. C. S. d. (2022). Sustainable Feedstocks and Challenges in Biodiesel Production: An Advanced Bibliometric Analysis. Bioengineering, 9(10), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100539
  32. Serqueira, D., Pereira, J., Squissato, A.L., Rodrigues, M., Lima, R., Faria, A., Richter, E., and Munoz, R. (2021). Oxidative stability and corrosivity of biodiesel produced from residual cooking oil exposed to copper and carbon steel under simulated storage conditions: Dual effect of antioxidants. Renewable Energy, 164, 1485–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.097
  33. Setyawardhani, D. A., Ammar, T., and Ammar, Y. (2022). Tertiary butylhydroquinone influence over oxidation stability of biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Jurnal Rekayasa Proses, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.22146/jrekpros.67177
  34. Silviana, S., Anggoro, D. D., Hadiyanto, H., Salsabila, C. A., Aprilio, K., Utami, A. W., Sa'adah, A. N., & Dalanta, F. (2022). A Review on the Recent Breakthrough Methods and Influential Parameters in the Biodiesel Synthesis and Purification. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11(4), 1012-1036. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.43147
  35. Uğuz, Assoc. Prof. Dr. G., Atabani, A., Mohammed, M., Shobana, S., Uguz, S., Kumar, G., & Al-Muhtaseb, A. (2019). Fuel stability of biodiesel from waste cooking oil: A comparative evaluation with various antioxidants using FT-IR and DSC techniques. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101283
  36. Ulukardesler, A. H. (2023). Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Different Types of Catalysts. Processes, 11(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072035
  37. Wahyono, Y., Hadiyanto, Budihardjo, M.A., Hariyono, Y., Baihaqi, R.A., (2022). Multifeedstock Biodiesel Production from a Blend of Five Oils through Transesterification with Variation of Moles Ratio of Oil: Methanol. International Journal of Technology. 13(3), 606-618. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i3.4804
  38. Zuleta, E. C., Baena, L., Rios, L. A., and Calderón, J. A. (2012). The oxidative stability of biodiesel and its impact on the deterioration of metallic and polymeric materials: A review. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 23(12), 2159–2175. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532012001200004

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-03-20 12:59:08

No citation recorded.