skip to main content

View PDF Download fulltext

Economic and global warming impact assessment of biomass power generation in Thailand

1Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand

2The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

3Centre of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, Bangkok, Thailand

Received: 10 Feb 2026; Revised: 17 Jun 2026; Accepted: 10 Jul 2026; Available online: 29 Jul 2026; Published: 1 Sep 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

To strengthen energy security, Thailand launched the Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP2018) in which the biomass energy production goal was set. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic and global warming impacts of power generation from biomass, including rice straw, rice husk, bagasse, and firewood, using input-output analysis. Five increasing biomass energy production scenarios are set corresponding to AEDP2018.The results show that biomass power promotion helps enhance Thailand’s economic growth. The highest growth of all scenarios is found when 3,500 MW of installed fossil-fuel capacity is replaced by biomass-based capacity from rice straw. The replacement leads to 0.058 percent increase in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 0.050 percent increase in total employment as compared to business-as-usual (BAU). Besides, the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission of the country is lower than that of the BAU in every scenario, showing that the development of biomass power generation can help reduce climate change impact. As it provides the highest economic benefits and still has large remaining resource potential, rice straw should be prioritized for expanding biomass power generation, while firewood, bagasse, and rice husk should play supporting roles based on their advantages. Not only can the results of this study support Thailand’s transition toward a cleaner energy future, but also the method presented in this study can be a guideline for other developing countries aiming to expand renewable electricity from biomass.

Keywords: economic impact; greenhouse gas; input-output table; biomass energy

Article Metrics:

  1. Bank of Thailand (2015) Macroeconomic indicators in Thailand., https://www.bot.or.th/App/BTWS_STAT/statistics/ReportPage.aspx?reportID=409&language=th. Accessed on 14 October 2021
  2. Base Load Plant Research and Development Division (2023) Building knowledge, understanding and good Attitudes towards working on energy in the community project: biomass energy. https://www.ocsb.go.th/. Accessed on 18 March 2023
  3. Bildirici, M.E., Özaksoy, F. (2013) The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption in some European countries. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 5(2), 023141; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4802944
  4. Cheewaphongphan, P., Junpen, A., Kamnoet O., Garivait, S. (2018) Study on the Potential of Rice Straws as a Supplementary Fuel in Very Small Power Plants in Thailand. Energies, 11(2), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020270
  5. DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency) (2013) Assessment of the energy potential of each type of biomass., http://biomass.dede.go.th/biomass_web/index.html. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  6. DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency) (2015) Thailand Alternative Energy Situation 2015. https://www.dede.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=47340. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  7. DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency) (2018) Alternative Energy Development Plan 2018-2037. http://www.eppo.go.th/images/POLICY/PDF/AEDP2015.pdf. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  8. DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency) (2021) Thailand Energy Balance. https://www.dede.go.th/ewt_w3c/ewt_news.php?nid=47341. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  9. DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency) (2022) Information on the purchase of biomass fuel of various types of biomass power plants in Thailand. https://webkc.dede.go.th/testmax/node/6248. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  10. Department of Climate Change and Environment. (2024). Thailand's First Biennial Transparency Report (BTR1). Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Thailand
  11. EFE (Energy for Environment Foundation). (2015). Biomass price. http://www.efe.or.th/efe-book.php?task=25. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  12. Gómez D.R., Watterson, J.D, Americano, B.B., Ha, C., Marland, G., Matsika, E., Namayanga, L.N., Osman-Elasha, B., Saka, J.D.K., Treanton, K. (2006) Chapter 2: Stationary Combustion. In Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., and Tanabe K. (eds), 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/2_Volume2/V2_2_Ch2_Stationary_Combustion.pdf
  13. Haputta, P, Bowonthumrongchai, T, Puttanapong, N., Gheewala, S.H. (2022) Effects of Biofuel Crop Expansion on Green Gross Domestic Product. Sustainability, 14, 3369; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063369
  14. Henriques, C.O., Sousa, S. (2023) A Review on Economic Input-Output Analysis in the Environmental Assessment of Electricity Generation. Energies, 16(6), 2930; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062930
  15. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2021) Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: IEA
  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/
  17. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2022) Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
  18. Jongdeepaisal, C., Nasu, S. (2020) Hybrid input-output analysis to evaluate economic impacts of biomass energy. International Journal of Green Energy, 17(1), 937-945; https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1814301
  19. Jusakulvijit, P., Bezama, A., Thrän, D. (2021) The Availability and Assessment of Potential Agricultural Residues for the Regional Development of Second‑Generation Bioethanol in Thailand. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 12, 6091–6118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01424-y
  20. Kumar, I., Feng, K., Sun, L., Bandaru, V. (2022) Adoption of biomass for electricity generation in Thailand: Implications for energy security, employment, environment, and land use change. Renewable Energy, 195, 1454-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.162
  21. Kunanuntakij, K., Varabuntoonvit, V., Vorayos, N., Panjapornpon, C., Mungcharoen, T. (2017) Thailand Green GDP Assessment Based on Environmentally Extended Input Output Model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 970-977; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.106
  22. Kelkar, M. (2024) Demise of fossil fuels part I: Supply and demand. Heliyon, 10, e39200; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39200
  23. Liu, T., McConkey, B., Huffman, T., Smith, S., MacGregor, B., Yemshanov, D., Kulshreshtha, S. (2014) Potential and impacts of renewable energy production from agricultural biomass in Canada. Applied Energy, 130, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.044
  24. Miller, R.E., Blair, P.D. (2009) Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  25. National Statistical Office. (2015). Labor statistics. http://statbbi.nso.go.th/staticreport/page/sector/th/02.aspx
  26. NESDC (Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council) (2021) Thailand’s 2015 Input-Output Table. https://www.nesdc.go.th/main.php?filename=io_page. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  27. OAE (Office of Agricultural Economics) (2015) Monthly retail price of fertilizer. https://catalog.oae.go.th/en/. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  28. Pandey, S., Byerlee, D., Dawe, D., Dobermann, A., Mohanty, S., Scott, R., Hardy, B. (2010) Strategic Research and Policy Issues for Food Security, International Rice Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152078
  29. PEA (Provincial Electricity Authority) (2017) 2015 Electricity tariff. https://www.pea.co.th/sites/default/files/documents/tariff/Electricity_Tariff_2015.pdf. Accessed on 20 November 2021
  30. Singh, R., Patel, M. (2022) Effective utilization of rice straw in value-added by-products: A systematic review of state of art and future perspectives. Biomass and Bioenergy, 159, 106411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106411
  31. TGO (Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization) (2016) GHG Emissions from Fertilizer. https://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=Y0hKdlpIVmpkSE5mWkc5M2JteHZZV1E9. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  32. TGO (Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization) (2022) Emission Factor. https://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=YjNKbllXNXBlbUYwYVc5dVgyVnRhWE56YVc5dQ. Accessed on 21 November 2021
  33. United Nations (2018) Handbook on Supply and Use Tables and Input–Output Tables with Extensions and Applications. United Nations, New York
  34. Waewsak, J., Ali, S., Gagnon, Y. (2020) Site suitability assessment of para rubberwood-based power plant in the southernmost provinces of Thailand based on a multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 137, 105545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105545
  35. Wianwiwat, S., Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2011) Modelling the promotion of biomass use: A case study of Thailand. Applied Energy, 36, 1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.055
  36. Zhao, Z.U., Yan, H. (2012) Assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China. Department of Engineering Management, School of Economics and Management. Renewable Energy, 37, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.017

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-03 12:06:31

No citation recorded.