skip to main content

Free-surface effects on the energy-harvesting performance of a fully passive flapping foil

1Shanghai Branch of Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., China

2Department of Power Mechanical Engineering,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, China

Received: 8 Jun 2026; Published: 8 Oct 2026.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Fully passive flapping-foil energy harvesters offer structural simplicity and require no external actuation, but their self-excited motion and power extraction may be strongly affected by a deformable free surface during near-surface operation. To clarify this influence, a two-dimensional numerical investigation is conducted on a fully passive NACA0015 flapping foil at a Reynolds number of 500,000 and a Froude number of 0.1581. The Volume of Fluid method and an overset-mesh technique are employed to resolve free-surface deformation and foil motion, respectively. The Reynolds number, foil geometry, pitching-axis location, and structural parameters are kept constant, while only the ratio of submergence depth to foil chord length is varied. The energy-harvesting efficiency exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on submergence depth. Among the examined cases, the maximum efficiency of 45.98% is obtained at a submergence-depth-to-chord ratio of 2.8, representing an improvement of approximately 8.16% over the unconfined baseline efficiency of 42.51%. When this ratio is 1.8 or less, strong free-surface deformation and wave radiation disrupt wake coherence and load–motion phase coordination, producing negative heaving-power intervals and substantially suppressing the positive pitching-power contribution. When the ratio reaches 3.5 or greater, the free-surface influence becomes weak and the efficiency approaches the unconfined baseline. The dominant Strouhal number of the heaving and pitching motions remains approximately 0.1, while pressure cross-correlation analysis shows that free-surface proximity attenuates pressure-fluctuation coherence without altering the leading-edge-vortex-governed propagation mechanism. These results demonstrate that moderate free-surface interaction can enhance energy extraction, whereas excessive interface proximity causes pronounced performance deterioration, providing a preliminary reference for selecting the deployment depth of fully passive flapping-foil energy harvesters.
Keywords: Fully passive flapping foil; Energy harvesting; Free-surface effect; Submergence depth; Vortex dynamics
Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract 12572278; National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract 12272357

Article Metrics:

  1. Boudreau, M., Gunther, K., & Dumas, G. (2019). Free-pitching flapping-foil turbines with imposed sinusoidal heave. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 90, 110-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.06.012
  2. Deng, J., Caulfield, C. P., & Shao, X. M. (2014). Effect of aspect ratio on the energy extraction efficiency of three-dimensional flapping foils. Physics of Fluids, 26(4), 043102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4872224
  3. Deng, J., Shao, X. M., & Yu, Z. S. (2007). Hydrodynamic studies on two traveling wavy foils in tandem arrangement. Physics of Fluids, 19(11), 10, 113104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2814259
  4. Duncan, J. H. (1983). The breaking and non-breaking wave resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 126, 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112083000294
  5. Filippas, E. S., & Belibassakis, K. A. (2014). Hydrodynamic analysis of flapping-foil thrusters operating beneath the free surface and in waves. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 41, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112088000205
  6. Grue, J., Mo, A., & Palm, E. (1988). Propulsion of a foil moving in water waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 186, 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.01.008
  7. He, G. H., Mo, W. J., Gao, Y., Wang, J. D., Zhang, Z. G., Yang, H., & Mao, W. H. (2022). Numerical study of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil on power-extraction with wing-in-ground effect. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 115, 22, 103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103761
  8. Kinsey, T., & Dumas, G. (2012). Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of a Hydrokinetic Turbine Based on Oscillating Hydrofoils. Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 134(2), 16, 021104. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005841
  9. Kinsey, T., Dumas, G., Lalande, G., Ruel, J., Méhut, A., Viarouge, P. (2011). Prototype testing of a hydrokinetic turbine based on oscillating hydrofoils. Renewable Energy, 36(6), 1710-1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.037
  10. Liu, Z. L., Huang, Q. X., Li, Z. J., Li, Y., & Feng, X. Y. (2023). Partial confinement effects on the performance of a flapping foil power generator. Physics of Fluids, 35(2), 14, 027108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134701
  11. Lua, K. B. (2026). Recent advances in flapping-wing aerodynamics: Mechanisms, kinematics, and bioinspired configurations. Physics of Fluids, 38(4), 50, 041302. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0323309
  12. Lv, Y. F., Sun, L. P., Bernitsas, M. M., & Sun, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of nonlinear oscillators in hydrokinetic energy harnessing using flow-induced vibrations. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, 45, 111388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111388
  13. Mann, S., Dumas, G., & Oshkai, P. (2025). Effect of confinement on the hydrodynamic performance of a fully-passive oscillating-foil turbine. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 133, 14, 104258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104258
  14. McKinney, W., & DeLaurier, J. (1981). Wingmill: an oscillating-wing windmill. Journal of energy, 5(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62510
  15. Oshkai, P., Iverson, D., Lee, W. L., & Dumas, G. (2022). Reliability study of a fully-passive oscillating foil turbine operating in a periodically-perturbed inflow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 113, 12, 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103630
  16. Peng, Z. L., & Zhu, Q. (2009). Energy harvesting through flow-induced oscillations of a foil. Physics of Fluids, 21(12), 9, 123602. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3275852
  17. Qi, Z. F., Xing, Z. W., Wang, Y. M., Chen, X. Y., Li, H. L., Liu, Y., & Shang, Z. Y. (2025). Propulsion performance of a flapping foil near free surfaces: Effects of submergence depth, Strouhal number, and pitching amplitude. Physics of Fluids, 37(2), 13, 025168. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0251644
  18. Theodorakis, K., Ntouras, D., & Papadakis, G. (2022). Investigation of a submerged fully passive energy-extracting flapping foil operating in sheared inflow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 113, 21, 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103674
  19. Veilleux, J. C., & Dumas, G. (2017). Numerical optimization of a fully-passive flapping-airfoil turbine. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 70, 102-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.01.019
  20. Wang, F. L., Zhu, B., He, Z. L., & Zhang, W. (2025a). Enhancing energy harvesting ability of a flapping wing with a coupled leading-edge rotating cylinder and trailing-edge oscillating flap. Physics of Fluids, 37(8), 12, 085111. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0279193
  21. Wang, F. L., Zhu, B., Xiao, Q. S., Zhang, W., & Zhang, H. B. (2025b). Numerical analysis of energy harvesting property and wake evolution characteristics for semi-passive flapping airfoil with various pitching amplitudes. Meccanica, 60(2), 271-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-025-01940-4
  22. Wang, F. L., Zhu, B., Zhou, J., & Zhang, W. (2026). Cylinder wake effects on the propulsion and underlying mechanisms of a semi-passive flapping wing. Ocean Engineering, 346, 20, 123941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123941
  23. Wang, Y., Sun, X. J., Huang, D. G., & Zheng, Z. Q. (2016). Numerical investigation on energy extraction of flapping hydrofoils with different series foil shapes. Energy, 112, 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.092
  24. Xiao, Q., & Zhu, Q. (2014). A review on flow energy harvesters based on flapping foils. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 46, 174-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.01.002
  25. Xu, G. D., Duan, W. Y., & Zhou, B. Z. (2017). Propulsion of an active flapping foil in heading waves of deep water. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 84, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.08.014
  26. Young, J., Ashraf, M. A., Lai, J. C. S., & Platzer, M. F. (2013). Numerical Simulation of Fully Passive Flapping Foil Power Generation. Aiaa Journal, 51(11), 2727-2739. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052542
  27. Zhao, F. W., Qadri, M. N. M., Wang, Z. K., & Tang, H. (2021). Flow-energy harvesting using a fully passive flapping foil: A guideline on design and operation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 197, 12, 106323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106323
  28. Zheng, K. Y., He, S. D., Zhao, X. Z., Shen, L., & Zhu, X. J. (2024). Free-surface-induced ground effect for flapping swimmers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 997, 14, A36. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.830
  29. Zhu, B., Wang, F. L., & Wang, L. Y. (2023). Cavitation induced hysteresis of a pitching hydrofoil near free surface. Meccanica, 58(9), 1765-1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01698-7
  30. Zhu, B., Wang, F. L., Xu, W. J., & Xiao, Q. S. (2023). Mode transition mechanisms in semi-passive flapping-wing propulsion or energy extraction. Physics of Fluids, 35(12), 17, 123604. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0177197
  31. Zhu, Q. (2011). Optimal frequency for flow energy harvesting of a flapping foil. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 675, 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112011000334

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-10-13 08:15:46

No citation recorded.